Graphic Illustration: Reading Like a Historian

Sourcing

When and Where Was the Source Created?

What date, time or year was it written?

Where (location) was the source written?

Who Created the Source?

Why was the source written?

Was the source written for a specific purpose, such as for a specific event, or was the source written for pleasure?

How would this affect how you should interpret the source?

Was this source meant to be viewed by others or was it for personal use?

Is this source trustworthy or untrustworthy?

Is there a reason that this source would be biased?

What evidence lets you know that the source is trustworthy?

What evidence lets you know that the source is untrustworthy?

What type of a source is this? (Primary, Secondary)

How would this affect how the source is interpreted and trusted?

When did they create the source in relationship to the event?

Is the source created during or soon after the event?

Is the source created several years after the event?

How would time affect the reliability of the source?

Contextualization

When and Where Was the Document Created?

What was going on in that country or place during the time the source was written?

How does this affect how you interpret the source and the information contained in the source?

What Was Different Then and Now?

Does the source have a different meaning when interpreted in today's time?

Do phrases, locations and words have different meanings today then they did when the source was created?

How does that change the way you interpret the source?

Does the source have the same meaning today as it did when it was created?

Why does it have that same meaning?

Corroboration

How Does This Source Compare With Other Sources?

Is this source providing similar information as other sources? Do the facts and details seem to align with other sources?

What details from this source show you that it is similar to other sources? What details from other sources shows you that it is similar to this source?

Does the information in the source conflict with other sources? Does the new source raise new questions about the validity of old sources or vice versa?

How does this source conflict with other sources?

Why do you think it conflicts with other sources? What evidence from the sources show that there is conflict?

What new questions did you have after studying the new source?

How can those new questions be answered?

What new or previous sources can be used to answer new questions?

Wineburg, Samuel S. (2001) Historical thinking and other unnatural acts :charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.

References

(n.d.). Home | Stanford History Education Group. Reading Like A Historian | Stanford History Education Group. Retrieved February 14, 2016, from http://sheg.stanford.edu/rlh

Reading Like a Historian: Contextualization. (n.d.). Retrieved February 14, 2016, from https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/reading-like-a-historian-contextualization

Reading Like a Historian: Sourcing. (n.d.). Retrieved February 14, 2016, from https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/reading-like-a-historian-sourcing