Wi-Fi Radiaton Risks Disputes & Rebuttles

Defence: Wi-Fi beams don't affect humans negativley, even long term.

A Bogus comparison : "grossly unscientific"

Data recorded incorrectly measured to that ofphone signals.

Thus it is a "scare story"

Wave levels are 600 times less dangerous than those considerded by those of government.

Claim that:

Scientific Inverse law not respected, therefore all evidence compiled cannot be believed by scientists.

Defenders include:James Randerson ( Scientist)Paddy Regan (Scientist)Malcom Sperrin (Physicist )

Argument: That Wi-FI beams are capable of causing hazardouseffects on humans

"70% of secondary schools fitted with Wi-Fi"Without sufficient data on the long term health risks

Radiation emmited three times higher than that of a phone mast.

When the beam is at it's greatest intensity, it is harmful

Efforts were to:

Cause an uproar throughout the public, and gain attention.