Kategoriak: All - compliance - enforcement - investigation

arabera Alain Garrido 15 years ago

217

LSTD Ch. 6 Administr

The chapter delves into the intricacies of administrative law, focusing on the procedural requirements established by Congress through the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). It outlines the rulemaking process, emphasizing notice-and-comment rulemaking where interested parties can express their opinions.

LSTD Ch. 6 Administr

LSTD Ch. 6 Administrative Law

Limitations of the Agency Powers

Regulated by the three branches
Public accountability

Small business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

Allows small business recover their expenses and legal fees when they are considered excessive

Receive comments

enforces the regulatory flexibility act

60 days after making rule

Regulatory Flexibility Act

If it harms to much, be flexible and seek another law

Government in the Sunshine act

disclose info about meetings and agencies

limit

Crime, frustration of plans, future litigations or rulemaking

Freedom of information Act

Agencies have to disclose info

Office Of information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)

Cost-effectiveness of agency rules

Review without following APA

Veto power

Veto enabling legislation or modify it

Appoint federal officers

Legislative

Freeze laws

Small business regulatory enforcement fairness act

they have 60 days after making a rule

Investigation of agencies

Limits to agencies (monetary, time)

Erase agencies

Take away power from agencies

Judicial

Power to review Agencies decision

Limitations

Ripeness doctrine

Requirements

Controversy

Standing to sue

Exhaustion doctrine

Exhaust all the administrative remedies or processes

Unless remedies are inadequate

Enforcement

Agencies enforce themselves
Adjudication

Process of resolving dispute before a third neutral party

Agency orders

Initial order

Not applied

Can be applied

Agency commission

Apply

Federal court of appeals

Final Order

Hearings

Frequently informal

Formal adjudicatory hearing

Similar to trial

Differences

The burden of proof is place on the agency

More evidences accepted

APA

Requires

Agency issue a notice

Place

Time

legal authority for the hearing

Facts and law of the complaint

Trial-like arbitration procedure

Administrative law judge (ALJ)

APA makes sure of that

Separated

Works for the agency but has to be unbiased

Answer by the company

Agency issues a formal complaint

Negotiated Settlements

Solve the problem without additional proceedings

Agencies

Conserve their own resources

Business

Cheaper

Cooperative

Investigation

After Final rule, who is not following it?

Subpoenas

Limits

Burden of the demand on the party from whom the info is being sought

Company pays

Specifity of the demand for testimony or documents

Describe the material

Relevance of the information being sought

Use relevant info

Purpose of the investigation

Legitimate purpose

Subpoena duces tecum

Bring it with u (books, records)

Subpoena ad testificandum

Writ to make a witness appear at a hearing

Inspections

Alcohol or firearms

No need for warrant

4th amendment

Protects against unreasonable seaches, need a warrant

"friendly" way of getting the information

Judicial Deference to Agency Decisions

Judges Defend Agency decisions
But can the administrative agency interpretate its authority?

But in order to be assured, Agencies should follow the rulemaking procedure

Chevron case

Yes

Court should accept aAgency Reasonable? Court accept it

Congress is silent or ambiguous

Precedural requirements

The APA
(No APA control) Informal Agency Actions

Interpretive Rules

Advice over enabling statute's meaning

dont follow

Rulemaking!

Rulemaking procedures

Notice-and-comment rulemaking

Final rule

States

Purpose

Basis

Published in the Federal Register

Code of Federal Regulations

Binding

Legislative rules

Affect Rights

Comment period

Interested parties express opinions

Change or mantain rule and answer why

Notice of the proposed rulemaking

Publish notice in Federal Register

Scientific data backing up the proposal

Terms and subject matter

Authority

Where and When proceeding

Is it lawful?

Judicial control over administrative agencies

Decision contrary to the evidence

Failed to consider relevant factors

Legally inappropriate factors

Changed prior policy without explanation

No rational explanation

2. Laws arent lawful when

Not accordance with law

abuse of discretion

Capricious

Arbitrary

1. Unlawful

Created by

Administrative Agencies
Types

Independent

"Fourth Branch"

Bureaucracy

President

Appoint members

Employees

Cannot be removed without just cause

Serve for fixed terms

Examples: FTC, SEC

Apart from the government

Executive

Authority: The president

Branch of the government

Its created by

Congress

Enabling Statute

Defines its legal authority

Enabling Legislation

Name, Purposes, Functions and Powers

Specific regulations

Society is better off

Burden on the businesses

Small business

No Economies of scale

Experts