a kholoud hassany 17 éve
654
Karl Popper
Karl Popper challenged the traditional view that science seeks absolute truth, instead emphasizing the importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific theories. He argued that genuine science makes bold conjectures and takes risks by putting forward statements that can be potentially proven false.
Megnyitás
Karl Popper but pysical theories are free of immunizing and exclude conceivable possibilities marxism and psychoanalysis are meta physical Psychoanalysis was ammune to start with strategy and emained so no longer a science, broke accepting falsification Marxism was ascience, refuted ,clashed with its predictions make adistinction:physical and meta physical theroies the demarcation between science and non science are tested, refuted and clashed with reality bold scientific conjectures but it had some steps 2 the truth his predictions contradicted Newton bold,not the truth that decidd the theory regard his theory as refuted, and it was false led Popper to the philosophy of science Einestein's theory of graviation Kepler they approximate to truth but they r not true three laws of planetary motion detailed predictions of the apperances they made minor predictions(scientific) they didnt predict new observable appearences(un scientifc) the sun was on the center, but it is false rejected hidden reality behind the appearence was bold as it clashed with all then accepted views copernicus's,Aristarchus's conjecture they try first to find not being wrong daring if they take a risk of being false new and daring conjectures His picture of men of bold ideas object to his theory of truth many great scientific changes didn't come through falsification the opinion of the scientists rejected to the claims of scientists of seeking truth said that a scientific statement must be falsifiable tried to identify the nature of truth a philosopher
