Human behavior: altruism, jealousy and infidelity from an evolutionary perspective
The postulates about the biologically adaptive human social behavior patterns that conform to the process of natural selection on the basis of a genetically determined programming in the nervous, hormonal systems (Ortega, 2006).
some of these behavior are
Infidelity and Jelousy
Infidelity is defined as unfaithfulness by virtue of being unreliable and the cheating on a relationship partner that takes place despite a commitment to exclusiveness (Zare, 2011).
recuperate to: http://los40mx00.epimg.net/los40/imagenes/2018/12/06/moda/1544111399_773427_1544111492_gigante_normal.jpg
Gender Differences
Harris (2000) mentions that evolutionary psychologists have proposed a theory of gender differences in jealousy, which states that men and women have an innate predisposition to react differently to sexual infidelity versus emotional
Female
women are upset by emotional infidelity (Harris, 2000)
Male
Differences in jealousy pose the hypothesis that men are upset by sexual infidelity (Harris, 200)
Darwinian theory of cognitive modules
recuperate to: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRjEkcjMMGSYg2GJIHxc8caYJQMIwH6hyge6Os6vMXzyDt4P1xY
These theorists argued that men and women have different innate cognitive or emotional "modules" that determine their reactions to a couple's infidelity
Female
These studies find that most women report that emotional infidelity which would be worse than sexual infidelity,
Male
Evidently, men show more physiological reactivity to imagined sexual infidelity than to emotional infidelity (Harris, 2000)
Psychophysiology of jealousy
How are they studied?
The research techniques used to investigate the type of infidelity that is most annoying for each sex, originally incorporated psychophysiological records and self-reports (Buss et al., 1999)
Men
jealousy would evoke anger and a strong motivation for action (Buss, 1999)
female
women develop through the
phylogeny, a greater sensitivity to situations that threaten male parental investment in joint reproduction (Buss, 1999)
Altruism
we can define "altruism" as the behavior that benefits another organism, not closely related, and that is in apparent detriment to the organism that behaves in an altruistic manner (Matinés,2003)
Theories of explanation
HAMILTON’S THEORY OF KIN ALTRUISM
altruism, while benefiting the recipient, reduces the altruistic physical fitness (Buss, 2016)
while it favors those who benefit physical fitness
increases reproductive success
if natural selection disapproves of traits that impose a cost on physical fitness
reduces reproductive success
KIN RECOGNITION
combination of couples as evidence of a kinship recognition mechanism (Buss,2016)
considering
human capacity to detect family similarities
SINGLE LOCUS KIN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS
conjectured if a gene gave rise to a recognizable phenotype
and at the same time induced the bearer to benefit individuals sharing that phenotype
would spread faster and prevail over competing genes
THE COSTS AND BENEFITS (Buss, 2016)
Mother and Granmthers
survival of the offspring
create by Herin Camila Lopez
REFERENCES
Buss, D. M. (Ed) (2016). The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Volume 2. Cap. 18. Pag, 528-547
Buss, D. M., Shackelford T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Chloe, J., Hasegawa, M., Hasegawa, T., et al. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6(1), 125- 150
Harris, C. (2000). Psychophysiological Responses to Imagined Infidelity: The Specific Innate Modular View of Jealousy Reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 78 (6). Pag 1082-1091. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1082
Martinez, M. (2003). La evolución del altruismo. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia Vol. 4 Págs. 27-42. Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/414/41400902.pdf
ORTEGA, L. (2006). PARALELOS EVOLUTIVOS EN EL ESTUDIO DEL COMPORTAMIENTO: CONSIDERACIONES EN TORNO AL PROBLEMA DEL MODO CAUSAL. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, volumen 38, No 1, p. 103-118: recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v38n1/v38n1a07.pdf
Zare, B. (2011). Review of studies on infidelity . IPEDR vol.19 Recupérate to: http://www.ipedr.com/vol19/34-ICAMS2011-A10054.pdf