Karl Popper

a philosopher

tried to identify the nature of truth

said that a scientific statement must be falsifiable

rejected to the claims of scientists of seeking truth

the opinion of the scientists

many great scientific changes didn't come through falsification

object to his theory of truth

His picture of men of bold ideas

new and daring conjectures

daring if they take a risk of being false

they try first to find not being wrong

copernicus's,Aristarchus's conjecture

was bold as it clashed with all then accepted views

rejected hidden reality behind the appearence

the sun was on the center, but it is false

they didnt predict new observable appearences(un scientifc)

they made minor predictions(scientific)

Kepler

detailed predictions of the apperances

three laws of planetary motion

they approximate to truth but they r not true

Einestein's theory of graviation

led Popper to the philosophy of science

bold,not the truth that decidd the theory

regard his theory as refuted, and it was false

his predictions contradicted Newton

but it had some steps 2 the truth

bold scientific conjectures

are tested, refuted and clashed with reality

the demarcation between science and non science

make adistinction:physical and meta physical theroies

Marxism was ascience, refuted ,clashed with its predictions

no longer a science, broke accepting falsification

Psychoanalysis was ammune to start with strategy and emained so

marxism and psychoanalysis are meta physical

but pysical theories are free of immunizing and exclude conceivable possibilities