カテゴリー 全て - assessment - competence - theories - language

によって Isabel Cardona 9年前.

340

purpura 2008

The text explores the intricate relationship between language assessment and communicative competence, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to evaluating language skills.

purpura 2008

Modifications made

Rejected by McNamara (1990)

difficult to fully apply in tests
in order to

assign importance to one component of language

Chahoub Deville (2003)

argued it failed
Person mediated for context

Purpura (2004) affirms

can be strenthened
Explanation of grammatical resoueces use
Definition of mening

Specified CLA components

Pragmatic knowledge

defined as
sociolinguistic knowledge
Functional knowledge

Organizational knowledge

divided into
Textual knowledge (discourse level)
Grammatical knowledge

They prove

The main theoretical framework

focus on
Testing
Teaching
Language
Communication

Communicative competence

Grammatical form

Grammatcal, sociolinguistic, discourse

accepted

;odel of communicative competence
Like a mix of

It was refuted

In use of factors analisys

Findings for empirical studies

To be measure through the four skills

Brought basis for

First TOEFL
Integrative tasks
Discret point

Carroll (1968)

"Skills and components models of proficiency"

Grammar and lexis
Phonology and ortography

Canal and Swain (1983)

Munltipotencial model

Lado (1961)

"skill and elements"

Specify
Lexicon
Structure

Can be assessed separately

Phonology

Oller (1979)

Pragmatic expentancy grammar

One integrative task

Way to measure Language ability

Bachmand and Palmer (1996)

Proposed

Multicomponential model of CLA

Defined as

formal language elements

Language skills

Standards

The aim is to reflect about how learners

analize how affect

assessment
learning

use knowledge for communication

represent L2 knowledge

Topic flotante

CLA assessment (Purpura 2008)

Subtema

Topic principal

Components of knowledge

Pragmatic
Discourse
Sociolinguistic
Lexical
Gramatical

Theories