b1 ch7 narrative (vigotsky mothers)
It is assumed that:1. babies: designed to learn – esp. socially because they have psychological needs
2. predisposed to direct attn to people (s.FANTZ)
3. Dev. involves interaction: relationships
A. Readiness of interaction of mothers and Babies
A. Role of Babies
Infants born with a readiness to focus on caregivers
Traverthen: in the first month babies and moms interations are fine-tuned & coordinated
Cohn: Still face studies show that babies protest and react wari when showed depressse expresssions
B. Role of carers
Over-interpretation and wishful thinking shapes behaviour
B. Theories of relationships
Pychoanalysis
Freud
Early relationships important for adult personality (3-5y)
oedipus complex start of devlopment towars male or female identity
Melanie Klein
vs. Freud important from birth
subjective interpretation of psychoanlyst is important
Projection
important concept for how wee see other people (dealing conciously not acceptable desires, fears etc.)
Carer
Projects own motives into child
attributions will shape careres behaviour
Child
Projecst own motives into caregiver
Our own mental representatinos are partially shaped by our whishful thinking
C. Methods
A single carer
Western Psychology focuses on dyadic interactions
However puts too much emphasis on mother. infant interactions
Shaped by western construction of how relation has to be.
Research based on minimizing emotions
good or bad but bad emotions challenge self image of mother
D. Meshing
Turn-taking is a key feature of adult infant interactions
Proto convesations
Mothers: i.e. scaffolding: How mothers shape their behaviour around the child
Babies: Even very young babies are active particpants: Brazelton&Cramer
Importance
1 Relatedness (emotinal )
2 Meaning (a reponse)
mother gives meaning to babies beh. and babies respond (s still face)
3 Structure (timing)
Burst pause feedin: mothers fit behaviour around their shaking and talking
Examples
Kaye& Brazelton: Jiggling / sucking sychronicity
Produces a Conversation-like interaction
Kaye& Fogel
Dev. of greeting: + clustering vs. random, passive to equal participation
6w random and reactive
13w some proative
clustering i.e. like burst pause rhythm
26w equally reative and proactve: most likely when infant was attending to mother
Motherese (Fernald)
Mothers adust their speach w. high pitch,short, exagerated
thought to facilitate learning
Fazit
Mother frame infants behaviour so that they can become more active
pseudo-dialogue might have no meaning but it is interactive
E. Role of imitation
Moran et al: 1y mothers show more imitation
perhaps anticipatory demonstrating sensitiviy
Pawlby:
a) mothers did more imitation
b)progression: face / sound and hand/ actions with objects
Fazit
Mothers use natural repertoir to
a) frame interactions b) attribute intetent
a) Baby learns it is effective, sense of relatedness, and TOM (mothers mind mindedness)
Traverthen: Intersubjectivity (leads simlar to stages of TOM)
primary
creates awareness of each others state (to subjective experience of the other)
secondary
Joint attention
F. Scaffolding
After understanding how interaction works ...
0. real Tutoring begins
Bruner: aiding language dev.
1. Joint action formats
simple stereotyped sequences of actions w. objects
2. Scaffolding
structure which allows better transmition (adult controlled)
Example
Book reading action format
Book reading using 4 utterances
contingent on childs behaviour
rules of polite adult dialogue
Newson& Newson. guiding infants visual behviour
Mothers supporting infants visual behaviour
catching their attention by certain movment contingent on their looking - assisting with her own.
Wood:
1. suggests: modeling,
2. cuing (whats next),
3. increasing demands
G. Containing: sothing the distressed baby
Bradley: 1,5-3h in quiet altert state
large time in distress
Oakley: many exp. neg feelings
70% angry
100% could not get enough sleep
Walker-Andrews: babies sense emotions
differentiate 4 differnt emotions
seem to express differnt emotions (cry,smile)
FAzit
emotinal experiences are not ease to handle: coping provides child with info: emo are containable
All this contributes to an internal model of relationship
H. Kein: Object relations
Deveopment of a mental model: neccessary to form attachment and later good realationships (s. bowlby)
Child constructs seperate part obects
child experieces good breast and bad breast
Unablie to unify =
copying with bad experience
2. schizoid position
1. depressive position=
Realization of one object: giving up the complete good leads to ambivalence
Leading to good satisfying relationships
But:Stern: Babies are unable to divide experiences. Normal experiences are good enought to get notion of grades of goodness
I. Transacting
Active vs.passive child
Both are active
Universality of Role of Mother is questionalable
Caring mother = is that a neccessary ingrediant?
Paradox of familarity
Interaction looks familar but the underlying meaning might be unclear
Othe culture are very different
Papua New Guinea
rarely talk or make eye contact
baby seen as unable to undersatnd