DEADLY WORK ACCIDENT - WORK AT HEIGHTS

Parties involved

Estate

Employer

Worker

It will help the debate by clarifying important legal problems, by determining what incentive structures generate various legal norms; generally within a “cost-benefit” analysis framework.

Have

health

Occupational hazards

Pension found

Layoffs

Due to failure to comply with the rules for working at heights, a worker dies

As a company it did not have corporate social responsibility, it did not contribute to the prevention of the death of the worker or to guarantee the benefit of himself and his family as the main affected party.

benefits of risk transfer

Time saving

shared responsibility

Control

Payment of compensation

Benefits AED

Create behavioral incentives

Identify efficient solutions

Build a more efficient law

benefits of risk taking

IDENTIFY

What how when,
where and why?

ANALYZE - EVALUATE

Possibility and
Consequences

TREATMEN

Proposed action
and plan

MONITORING

Supervision and surveillance

CONCLUSION

Although the rule is clear regarding compliance with the law, there was not full awareness of its application, which generated inappropriate conduct on the part of the company.^

Failures

Lack of supervision

Company overconfidence

Failure to comply with safety regulations

Lifeline breach

Company negligence

Avoid Accidents, Incidents and Workplace Illnesses.

Actors

The company didn^t analyze the cost benefit in its actions as a company in the face of non-compliance with the lifeline, which generated the worker's fatal accident.