Prijzen Aanmelden Registreren

Categorieën: Alle - evidence - empiricism - science - skepticism

door Vargha Dana 15 jaren geleden

282

Scientific and Critical thinking-vargha

Critical thinking and scientific thinking, while similar, diverge in focus with the former addressing societal issues and the latter investigating natural phenomena. Empirical evidence, which is derived from sensory experience, is considered more reliable than other forms such as emotional or hearsay evidence.

Victorians

door Shoshana Tootill

Evidencia_03_E3

door Delia Iveth

Forensic Sciences

door Marina Sabetti-Franklin

Ethics

door Desi McKeown

Scientific and Critical Thinking

they are the same but critical thinking deals with life and society while scientific thinking deals with investigating nature.

scientific method in practice

6.constructing theory

5.test fails

back to step '3'

4.testing hypothesis

3.proposing hypothesis

2.gathering information

1.stating the problem

Skeptisism

constant questioning of one's beliefs & conclusions

accept things as true only baced on

Logical Arguement

Emperical Evidence

test your beliefs against objectives

knowledge claims by self or others must be questioned

self-deception/deception by others: common human failings

Rationalism

logical reasoning

struggle with one's will,subjective beliefs, emotions and feelings

must be learned through formal education

cannot develope & improve it on their own

not born with it

not used by most people

Empiricism

can be seen, heard, touched, tasted, smelled

Natrural evidence: Evidence found in nature

Naturalism

rejects

beliefs based on Dogma

supernaturalism

absolute truth

emphsises strong connection between science & nature

relies on natural evidence