Martin Azpiroz - Bold

Offer to telcos, pay tv operators, ISPs, all of them. but main consumer are paytv - migrating to the web - from cable TV to OTT. planing this year to go outside their region - incorporating company in the US - will offer Today - all Latin American - planning to go abroad and are opening company in the states. Olders

Offer the whole ball of wax -- could be more companies that do that - Only think we don't do in the workflow - Have niagra DRM - use that - don't develop DRM

Dozens of systems Which NETINT products testedT408/T432/Quadra15 days to integrate hardware into their platform - quite smooth-Make some changes because use Sharif - deinterlacing on CPU - Quadra. Using FFmpeg - since 2011 - very customized - good engineering team- lots of knowledge of video and streaming - Not just for transcoding - handle video. PowerQuality - Stability - most important -way better performance than CPU. CPU is most stable - but power consumption is inasme for multiple channelsNETINT hardware - live input comes from saeillite - lots of issues - storms, many things - need to be resilient - taking input first - a lot of clock issues - IRDis - changes between timingingEngineering team can answer better - more stable that CPU - same channel - CPU/ASIC - microcuts - 5 per hour with CPU, 1 per hour with ASICTo do: Will send

talking about - experience in the region - how they adapt their solution to the problems that are.Satellite - HBO - disney - ESPN/Fox/ all the content powers -their customers cable TV operators (like DirectTV)Live events, movies, news channels, pay tv channels. DBC - MPEG TS over satellite - Receiver - provided by programmer - sign with HBO - send satellite - with receiver - can use streaming to ingest. Fiber or network Take the streaming that comes from that IRDIS Itermiediate receiver decoder - attached to satellite antenna - 264/265 - usually. UDP - MPTS - can be SDI - local channel - from cable from the studio - another input - OK from studios and content owners to use CMS - for trasncoding of VOD files - LSD (live streaming) to work in secure environment - VOD encoding - NETINT - the same.

Why the switch - when to recommend:when does it make sense New customers - standard product - ASIC - only version ofSecondcustomer using servers from 5 years agoEnergy - high temperature, 70% of capacity, should replace at 5 years in that environment- even with proper housing- running at 70-80% replaceThird - Adding channels / replacing - many channels - this year - deploy 20 in 4K - hardware you have doesn't allow that - need to upgrade - can buy a server just for the new channels or upgrade the whole system - their advice - How did they learn about meet NETINT - Randal at NAB -- IBC - was introduced but don't remember - met Randal - NAB - contacted Fernando - no business card from booth - talked to Fernando>> Randal. Older customers - if they want 4K content, they need more hardware capacity - that's where NETINT enters in the upgrade plan.platform works with 4K even with GPU but usually don't have sufficient capacity - Used GPU - NVIDIA - Pascal to currentNETINT compared to - CPU - most software encoding CPU - best quality - even better than NETINTThroughput isn't sufficient - power too high - can see 2 CPUs - 2/3 channels - five profiles - server costs $6,000 - same server [ut a quadra - can process Put low quality on throughput on CPU - GPU - throughput/quality/power efficiencyGPU - beats -- deinterlacing- MBTS - several satellites per provider - Universal, disney, AMC - 30% or moreWork with 265 - but mobile devices - can't do 265 - don't both in parallel - doubles their bandwidth and processing requiring - once phone replacements - subscribers will have 6 year old phones with no 265 decode. CPU - on mobile for HEVC - drains batter - so, keep with 264 - just a click - 264/2654. Mobile vs. smart TVs - their platform is more mobile platforms - smart TVs - replacement - slower than in other regions - TV lasts 10 years. Apps - tysen / webos - will be working with smart TVs. encoding ladder - different customers - no 4K - 3/4 customers planning to move to 4K - 30% are 1080/70% of customers using 720p - not a platform or transcoding issue - bandwidth on subscriber and CDN. Most are still ower bandwidth -