(CATWOE) Sucessful latop implemetation

4 pumps - innovative capacity

r

(OECD 2004 Pg 58)

innovative opportunities

scientific advances

User models and capabilities

Modular systems

ICT as an innovative tool

Critical actors and relationships

large companies R&D

Horizontal communities

Architect and module designers

ICT suppliers managers stakeholders customers

Contributions to the knowledge base of the sector

scientific knowledge that can improve processes and products

practical knowledge that can be adopted by community

intergrate knowledge

Codify knowledge

Model - holon relevant to debating perceptions of real world

Customers/victims of T

Students

parents

teachers

schools

Educational authorities

Government

Communities

economy

new generation of ICT literate workers?

Actors/those who would do T

Government

Educatioanl authorities

schools

parents

Students

Transformation process/input to output

Weltenschauung/worldview T in meaningful context

Owners/those who would stop T

Teachers

r

Similar to NHS ICT based initiative in UK (OECD 2004 pg 57) MAunsell and Currys studyNo time for training in use of ICT systemsSceptisism about the capacity of an ICT sytem to deliver enough knowledge to meet a need

Environmental constraints/elements outside the system

A system to do X by Y in order to achieve Z

Strategic Vision

Root Definition/laptop for learning

r

An emabling technology is not sufficient on it's own to transform knowledge across a sector (OECD 2004 Pg57)

primary task

1 to 1 laptop

How do you gauge successful implementation?

issue-based

21st Century learning

knowledge based economy KBE (OECD 2004)

Does this demand specific new skills?

teamwork

communication

learning skills

Issues & Potential of KBE

Access to inoformation and knowledge bases

Digital divide

knowledge is power

global village

Uneven development of knowledge

fast changing 'science-enlightened technology'

Slow changing education

Protect intellctual property rights

enforcement - patents copyrights leagal action

paradox - communications now exist to access knowledgeand create new knowledg laws prevent this

Problems of trust

internet fraud/inapropriate content/digital manipulation of informatio& images

Personal fragmented knowledge base

inability to form broad intergrated viewpoint

A society bereft of memory

issues

Why not more computers in classrooms?

Main topic

What is the rationale?

Pupil centrered directed learning

Iteration/modelling using ICT

Develop thinking skills

Deeper analysis of concepts processess and visualisation

Social collaboration

Out of school learning

Using ICT tools to locate, gather synthesis, analyses, reconstruct and communicate information

Gain knowledge beyond teacher

Creative development media literacy animations etc

Causal effects

Do we need 1 to 1 laptops?

Support e-learning

Teach in ways not possible before

Infrastructure

Does the school have the infrastructure to implement a succesful laptop programme?

Choice of computer systems

Same model

Lucrative for laptop provider

Software updates

Technoical support

Methodologies

Humanistic

Scientific

teacher training

Change in pedagogy

Classroom management

Teachers as innovators

Schooladministration

knowledge management tasks

horizontal networks

vertical networks

Monitoring and control

AUP's

Parents

Cost (Not an issue for NSW Yr9's)

Health/Safety of their children

Weight of computers

repetitive strain injury/Carpal Tunnel syndrome

Eyesight

Posture

Cyber safety/Digital citizens

Students loose written skills

How many hours a day will children spend on comuters?

Insurance cost if broken

Connection to internet at home?

Who ultimately responsible for the laptop?

Students and parents

School suport care and use?

How will schools manage interenet activity in school?

Firewall/Filters

How will schoosl ensure students are not distracted in class i.e. Facebook?

Roll out

Which year group?