The Connection Between the Poor Law an Public Health

1837 - 1838 london was hit by a typhus epidemic

Reports published as appendices to the anual report of the Poor Law Commission

governmnet auditors disallowed this expenditure

Edwin Chadwick

As a result numbers applying for poor relief increased dramatically

Ergo East London Poor Law Guardians spent money from the poor rates on;

removing filth from the streets

prosecuting negligent landlords

They acted on the connection between epidemics and living conditions

Home secretary reffered the matter to the Poor Law Commission

Argued forcefully that, because disease caused pauperism, the prevention of disease and so the prevention of pauperism

Ergo fell within the competence of the Poor Law Commission

The Poor Law Commission agreed with Chadwick

They authorised a piolot study on the connection between th enviroment with disease, Chadwick was to set it up

Neil Arnott

James Kay Shuttleworth

Southwood Smith

All three produced reports

Their reports backed up what James Kay found in Machester in 1832, but also suggested improvements

Ergo thier conclusion were brought to the attention of Parliament

Chadwick chose three doctors who had previous experience in snitary invetigations

Health conditions could not be acived under existing circumstances

overcrowding, poor ventalation and inadequate water supply and lack of refuse control caused disease

Edwin Chadwick, now had ammunition to make a case for full- scale poor Law enquiry

started in 1839 to be published in 1842

Poor Law commission refuse it to be publised because it cricised;

Water companies

Local authorities

medical proffesional

Chadwick had the whole thing published in his name and at his own expense