Categorii: Tot - politics - education - prayer - speech

realizată de Heather Christeson 7 ani în urmă

149

Policy Map - Spring 2017

The given text highlights the intricate legal and societal dynamics affecting educational institutions in Texas, focusing on themes such as the impact of the First Amendment, campus carry laws, and public school prayer.

Policy Map - Spring 2017

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/25/new-kind-of-trigger-warning-at-texas-university-struggling-with-campus-carry-law-do-not-confront-a-student/?utm_term=.465953920dd4

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/silencing-religious-students-on-campus/497951/

Limitations placed on various Colleges and Universities.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/

Heather Christeson

Freedom of Speech (1791)

“In the name of emotional well-being, college students are increasingly demanding protection from words, subjects and ideas they don’t like; that’s disastrous for education—and mental health”, according to Lukianoff and Haidt.
Catastrophizing

"A kind of magnification that turns commonplace negative events into nightmarish monsters”, according to Burns.

Magnification

Burns defines, "magnification as exaggerat[ing] the importance of things."

Microagressions

“Microagressions are small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless”, as defined by Lukianoff and Haidt.

Vindictive Protectiveness

"When speech comes to be seen as a form of violence, vindictive protectiveness can justify a hostile, and perhaps even violent, response”, as defined by Lukianoff and Haidt.

Trigger Warnings (verbal)

II. “Motivated reasoning”, “the idea that words (or smells or any sensory input) can trigger searing memories of past trauma - and intense fear that it may be repeated, also, a long list of ideas and attitudes that some students find politically offensive, in the name of preventing other students from being harmed, finally, to issue warnings before covering material that might evoke a negative emotional response”, as defined by Lukianoff and Haidt.

I. Alerts that something in a course might cause a strong emotional response; if a student has been previously victimized by racism, domestic violence, etc. they can choose to avoid these works, which they believe might “trigger” a recurrence of past trauma.”

Unprotected Speech
Lewdness
Obscenity
Fighting Words

Words that "by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace." Fighting words are not subject to the restrictions of the First Amendment.

Slander

Untrue spoken statements that defame the character of a person.

Libel

False written statement that defames a person's character.

Protected Speech
Unpopular Speech
Hate Speech

Any communication that belittles a person or group on the basis of characteristics.

Characteristics: A feature or quality belonging typically to a person, place, or thing and serving to identify it. Merriam-Webster

Identify: I. Establish or indicate who or what (someone or something) is. II. Associate (someone) closely with; regard (someone) as having strong links with. Merriam-Webster

Symbolic Speech

Symbols, signs, and other methods of expression generally considered to be protected by the First Amendment.

Prior Restraint

Constitutional doctrine that prevents the government from prohibiting speech or publication before the fact; generally held to be in violation of the First Amendment.

The Constitution of the United States of America, Amendment I

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Legal Institutions

Texas Education Agency
http://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/NCLB_and_ESEA/Other_NCLB_laws_and__rules/School_Prayer/

https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html

First Liberty Institute
https://firstliberty.org/

https://firstliberty.org/?s=Prayer+in+school

Texas Attorney General
https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Texas-Attorney-General-Raises-Concerns-over-Frisco-School-Prayer-Room-416443563.html

Cornell University Law School
https://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt1toc_user.html
Texans for Public Justice
http://www.tpj.org/
Texans for Lawsuit Reform
https://www.tortreform.com/
Texas Trial Lawyers Association
https://www.ttla.com/

Impact on Public School Prayer in Texas

Interest groups who count on Freedom of Speech

Texas Tea Party
https://www.texasobserver.org/left-tea-party/
The Far Left
Texas Leftist

https://texasleftist.com/

Democrat, Liberal, The Left
LGBT
Pro-Choice
The far far far cray cray Right
KKK

Arian Nation groups

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/lone-star-crazy-how-right-wing-extremists-took-over-texas-20140701

Republican, Conservative, The Right
The National Rifle Association

NRA

Pro-Life