Module 4: Moral Development
Moral Reasoning
seeking rationales for determine right vs wrong
Piaget's theory
Moral realism
kids believe that right vs wrong are determined by consequences of behavior as given by adult authority figures
Morality of cooperation
autonomy; they understand that in certain situations or under particular circumstances rules can be bent
they begin to see the complexity of right vs wrong; such as when lying may be necessary to spare someone's feelings or killing someone for self defense
Kohlberg's theory
Preconventional level
defined by an egocentric, self-interested view of right or wrong and disregards conventions or standards of society
punishment/obedience
naive hedonistic
egocentrism: focus on one's self w/ little consideration for other people or their perspectives
Conventional level
individual focuses on external authorities such as conventions & standards of society when determine right vs wrong
interpersonal authority
social authority
Postconventional
moves beyond simple consequences & away from external authorities to an internal authority
personal convictions about what is right vs wrong
morality of social contract
morality of individual principles
Gilligan's critiscim
Justice orientation
focuses on the rights of individuals
caring orientation
r
lack of attention to women and exclusion of female perspective
Aggressive behavior
Physical or overt aggression also could be relational aggression
Reasons that could be the cause
biological predispositions such as hormones or genetics
family influence such as family violence & abuse from parents or siblings
peer influence such as friends that are aggressive
cultural differences
other variables: exposure to violent TV or video games
Sociomoral developmental delay
self-centered, ego orientation that is not replaced by developmental later on
externalizing blame
see themselves as the victims rather than those they have victimized
mislabeling or minimizing
individuals will escape responsibilities for their actions by viewing their behavior as less serious than social conventions might judge
these cognitive distortions are used by people to decrease their feelings of empathy-based guilt
Social cognitive domains
moral domain includes situations & circumstances related to the rights of others as well as the welfare of others
most serious infraction
conventional domain focuses on the rules of conduct necessary for social organization
personal domain focuses on situations that affect the individual
the least serious infractions
Kenneth Dodge
suggest that people process social information in 6 steps
1. encoding cues
people pay attention to some info in their social environment & dismiss other information
2. Interpretation of cues
people determine meaning for those cues & causes of the behavior of others in the social environment
3. clarification of goals
people determine goals or outcomes for the situation
4. response decision
people attempt to remember past responses to similar situations
5. response decision
people evaluate the past responses & select the most appropriate response based on the expected outcome
6. behavioral enactment
individuals behave according to their decision to respond
significant difference between aggressive & nonaggressive people is interpretation of cues
Hostile attributional bias
tendency to interpret another person's intentions as hostile
Family context
Induction
parents explain discipline by verbally providing consequences of choices, as well as asking children to think about others' emotions (empathy)
Nurturance
parents express warmth & affection toward their child as an indication of their concern for the kid's emotional state (perspective taking)
Demandingness
parents set high standards of behavior for their children & support them in their attempts to meet these standards
Modeling
parents "practice what they preach" such that they become examples of moral conduct
Democratic processes
parents include children in decisions, particularly those that require them to hear and appreciate anothers' perspective
School Context
1. climate of trust
classroom & school system should have climate of trust & an ethical of caring
kids should feel safe to express emotions, knowing that they are supported & cared for by teachers & staff
teachers can share minor person info w/ students about family, pets, & hobbies as well as spend time learning about students hobbies, interests & family life
teachers can interact w/ students outside of instructional time such as having lunch w/ kids, engaging them in ordinary conversations about events, joking with students, allowing them to "goofy
teachers SHOULD be consistent & predictable in their responses & routine behaviors to impart a sense of trustworthiness
2. Developmental discipline:
Just as parents can use induction & a Democratic process to establish standards & consequences as well as encourage empathy, teachers should employment those same strategies within the classroom
teachers SHOULD help students understand the reasons behind rules
rules should include prosocial behaviors such as sharing, taking turns, & respecting others
teachers should hold regular class meetings & include collaboratively problem-solving to stop misbehavior in the classroom
BC adolescents will begin to view more power & control teachers should give adolescents more opportunities to contribute to the development of rules & to make choices w/in the classroom (democratic governance)
3. Service learning
method of instruction that combines learning w/ service to the community
can increase prosocial behavior and decrease aggressive behavior among students
4. Curriculum
moral curriculum should not be separated from academic content but rather the 2 should be connected & intertwined w/in the classroom & school
history lessons & classic lit include moral dilemmas, as do current events in social studies classes
characters w/in an academic until can be discussed from a moral standpoint
visual displays can be provided in classroom to increase awareness of moral issues & to encourage charitable behavior, a positive attitude, and an awareness of environmental concerns
5. challenging the status quo
students should not only be allowed but encouraged to challenge standards & social conventions to further their persepctive taking skills and advance their level of moral reasoning
6. school based interventions
extensive teacher training can facilitate moral development
Prosocial behavior
Foundations of individual compassion & self-sacrifice
tendency of humans to cooperate & share w/ 1 another; voluntary actions that are intended to benefit others through helping and sharing
Eisenberg's theory
diff from piaget & Kohlberg's due to focus on positive justice
Level 1: hedonistic or self focused orientation
individuals focus on the consequence to the self or self interest as a motive for prosocial behavior
Leve2: needs orientation
individuals focus on the needs of others, even when hose needs conflict w/ one's self interest
Level 3: approval/interpersonal orientation
individuals engage in prosocial behavior based on the stereotypical beliefs about a person, helping a person considered to be "a good person" & not helping a "bad person"
Level 4: self-reflective empathetic orientation
to determine whether their actions will result in positive feelings or feelings of guilt, individuals use empathy & perspective taking, ability to understand another person's situation or psychological state, such as their thoughts or feelings
Level 5: internalized orientation
individuals behave in prosocial ways due to their personal values rather than external authority or expectations
Perspective Taking
Stage 0: egocentric viewpoint
Preschool-age children (3-6) understand that other individuals have thoughts & feelings but confuse their own emotions w/ those of others or have difficulty understanding the causes of other's feelings
Stage 1: social informal role taking
early elem (6-8): understand that others have thoughts n feelings that may be diff than own but do NOT understand how diff perspectives are related
Stage 2: self-reflecting role taking
older elem kids (8-10): can understand the relationship between self & others perspective, enabling them to speculate on how another will feel
Stage 3: mutual role taking
early adolescents (10-12): able to take the perspective of 3rd party to understand how 2 individuals influence each other in a mutual, simultaneous manner.
Stage 4: social & conventional system role taking
middle adolescents (12-15): individuals are capable of understanding social conventions that are relevant to everyone rather than only to 1 individual
Empathy/Hoffman
ability to experience the emotions or feelings of another person
Stage 1: global empathy
will seek comfort for own needs when they are exposed to another's cry or emotional distress
Stage 2: egocentric empathy
toddlers begin to see diff between self & others. may attempt to comfort others but from own egocentric perspective
Stage 3: empathy for another's feelings
kids as young as 2/3 have awareness of others emotions & diff persp. can begin to understand what comforts them may not be what comforts others
Peer Context
sharing in young kids early sign of empathy super important prosocial behavior
parents & teachers SHOULD encourage peer interaction among kids
examples: students work collaboratively on projects & has been found to enhance moral reasoning, empathy, and perspective-taking skills
teachers can ensure kids have adequate peer interaction by using cooperative learning strategies