Examination of Cezannes painting
Art historians
conclusions
It is probably painted in the late 1880's
Different regions of the painting could age at different rates and diff. parts may be exposed to diff. conditions
claims and findings
Not surprisingly, the drawing was unsigned
The painting charasteristics is similar to cezannes other paintings
Brushwork is indistinguishable form his other paintings
Scientists examination
Ultraviolet spectrum investigation
The painting is not likely to be 100 years old
Infrared Spectroscopic technique
claims
Binder is based on animal glue
There is an underdrawing
There may exist pigment mix
conclusions
This painting may not be Cezanne's at all
X-ray fluoresence
there are no pigment anachronisms
the painting is an original 19th century one
Fluorescense using both short and long waves
claims
some areas of the painting show brighter flurosensce than the rest of the painting