Classical Leadership Styles

High levels of Authoritative leadership

Group leaders dictate all the work methods and
processes.

Strongly focused on command by leader.
Very distinct separation between team
members, and the leader

Rules are clearly outlined, and are very important.

Leaders make all the decisions

Little to no input from group members

Creativity and out-of-the box thinking is
discouraged.

Benefits:

decisions are easily made, especially in stressful
situations

Great where strong and direct leadership is needed

Effective in small groups.

Downsides:

Discourages input of others

Impair the confidence, and enthusiasm of the
group, often leading to resentment.

Ignore the solutions and expertise from
group members

Creativity is encouraged and rewarded

Leader has final say, though input from group members
is encouraged

Inspires trust and respect within the group
itself

Diverse opinions, and tries to not discourage
less popular point of view.

High productivity, strong contribution from group
better "morale"

Group members feel involved, and are more likely
to contribute.

Low levels of authoritative leadership,
"Very hands off"

Little to no guidance from leaders

Leaders just provide the tools and
resources needed.

Freedom for group members to make
decisions.

Expected to solve problems on their own

Power is handed over to the followers,
however leaders will take responsibility
for the groups decisions and actions.

Benefits

Can work for teams who're highly
motivated/skilled/expertise.

Value independence, and creativity.

Works well when information and
materials, are provided.

Subtopic

Drawbacks

Does not work well with groups
with lacking motivation/skills,
and adherence to deadlines.

Results in poor outcomes and
performance

Role confusion

Leaders appear un-involved.

Benefits:

More ideas and creative soultions

High productivity

Group members are committed

Drawbacks:

Failed communication

Minority and individual opinions are
overridden.

Poor decision making by less experienced
groups.