Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) emphasizes the integration of content and language learning by teaching the language forms necessary for understanding disciplinary discourse.
Learners may be able to produce the target language during controlled activities, but this doesn’t necessarily transfer to more spontaneous interaction.
This approach ( TBLT) assumes that language learning is linear.
Differences between CLIL and CLT
Implicit linguistic knowledge of their L1 and explicit linguistic knowledge of EFL.While CLIL develop world shared knowledge.
Differences between CLIL and EMI
Parts of the curriculum are
delivered through a foreign
language. Learners acquire the
target language naturalistical
While CLIL Learners are engaged in a joint learning practice of subject matter and foreign language, EMI, the central focus is on students’ content mastery and no language aims are specified.
Differences CLIL and CALLA
Language is functional
and input manipulation
depends on disciplinary
context.
Content determines the
language to be learnt.
CLIL is focused by learning subject-matter
content through the medium of a foreign
language.
CLIL
Integration of content,
disciplinary problems
and strategic solutions
to the problems
Assumes that content is a discourse construction and teaches the language forms that will allow comprehension of disciplinary discourse, thus integrating form, function and
meaning in its ideational, interpersonal and textual manifestations.
CLIL and CLT
This involves both a cognitive and a behavioral aspect
Communicative Language Teaching have been denominated the use of "authentic," "from-life" materials in the classroom, and CLIL manages the same structure.
Similarities CLIL and EMI
The use of English to teach
academic subjects in countries
or jurisdictions where the first
language (L1) is not English.
Both of them have the aim at the acquisition of subject
knowledge”
Similarities CLIL and CALLA
Both of them place value on what the student previously knew as well as the experiences of their culture, and using this knowledge in their academic learning of a new language.
Both of them use the content and skills necessary to be successful in their future academic pursuits
CALLA (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)The cognitive model of learning is used to help students to comprehend and retain language skills and concepts of the content taught.
Similarities Between CBI and CLil
CBI and CLIL both of them use
course content as a vehicle for
helping students master language
“Learners are engaged in a
joint learning practice of
subject matter and foreign
language”
“Parts of the curriculum are
delivered through a foreign
language. Using CBI Learners acquire the
target language naturalistically” (Coleman, 2006, p. 4)
Differences CBI Vs CLIL
Choose content for its relevance to
students’ lives, interests, and/or academic goals.
The teaching of language through
exposure to content that is interesting and relevant to learners” (Brinton, 2003, p. 201).
They involve an active participation of
students in the exchange of content.