Quantifying the Dynamic Effects of Service Recovery on Customer Satisfaction: Evidence From Chinese Mobile Phone Markets
Conclusions
The most viable strategy with respect to response time, short decline or long decline, its impact on recovery and user satisfaction is
Quality improvement
Tiene una durabilidad en el tiempo mayor, a diferencia de las otras estrategias
The compensation
It has a durability over time that is a little less than the improvement in quality
Generates greater and shorter term customer satisfaction
Communication
It's the one with the fastest response time in terms of customer satisfaction
Its durability in time is precarious, it decays quickly
The apology
It's the one with the lowest ranks
The apology is valuable, but what the study shows us is that its impact and durability over time is the shortest
FINAL CONCLUSION
If we take the strategies together, both in terms of costs, response time, reduced deterioration and user satisfaction, we could have a more viable approach to success.
Models:Modeling the Marketing Dynamics
Grainger model
Interactions of the 4 strategies generate a relationship in inverse causes
They do not play the effective role in individual measures.
Vector Auto-Regressive Models (VAR)
They shape the dynamics of marketing
Easy capture of complex and dynamic data
It manages to use each internal or endogenous variable
It takes the internal data of the system and puts it in relation to the results of all the variables
Estimating Parameters: Bayesian Method
Estimation to avoid potential overparameterization
Results
Quality improvement
It has a longer impact on the customer
Compensation and Communication
In the measure of duration these two are at least twice as low
The apology
The apology contemplates the lowest step
It's the one with the lowest impact.
Impacts on the organization
The financial impact is less if all four recovery strategies are used simultaneously
The response time will drastically affect the economic issue
The longer the company takes to take action or strategies focused on service recovery, the more money it will have to invest and the greater the customer dissatisfaction.
Comunnication
To transmit to the customers the development of the organizations
Communication
Accessibility
Information
Digital Marketing
Use of compensation
Standard measure for customer satisfaction
Statistical contribution
Digital marketing processes
This one has a greater viability than the apology.
methods of solution in cases of a bad service
recovery of the service and its long or short term affectation
More effective alternatives for recovering customers
the importance of good service
economic affectations for bad service and its failures
Quality improvement
Growth
Constant industry progress
Quality of service indicators
The apology
Categorical variable
Does not generate long-term viability
Not covered by customer satisfaction