Luokat: Kaikki - obligation - property - union - power

jonka Rossana Adorno 4 vuotta sitten

259

AN ESSAY CONCERNING THE TRUE ORIGINAL, EXTENT AND END OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT chapters VII, VIII, IX, XIV

The text discusses the concept of consent within a society, where individuals collectively agree to form a community for mutual benefits like safety, comfort, and peace. By consenting, individuals accept an obligation to follow the majority'

AN ESSAY CONCERNING THE TRUE ORIGINAL, EXTENT AND END OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT chapters VII, VIII, IX, XIV

The legislative power of the society can never be supposed to extend farther than the common good

THE ENDS OF POLITICAL SOCIETY

public good

safety

peace

PREROGATIVE POWER

is not an ENCROACHMENT upon anybody

Because the prince has interests for the good of the community
When princes use this power for private ends, the LIMITATIONS of the prerogative are declared by people

How is it posible to understand when the power is used in a right way?

There is no judge on earth able to solve the problem

The liberty TO APPEAL TO HEAVEN

the power to act according to discretion FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD, WITHOUT the prescription of the LAW, and sometimes even against it

EXAMPLE: the power of calling Parliaments in England
a power that can mitigate the severity of the law
The law-making power is sometimes too slow and it cannot forsee accidents and necessities.

WHAT is a sufficient DECLARATION of a man's CONSENT

TACIT CONSENT

Every man that has any POSSESSION, or ENJOYMENT, of any part of the dominions of any government, there he gives his tacit consent and he is OBLIGED to obey to the laws of that government
The obligation to submit to the government begins and ends with the enjoyment

Express Consent

2 OBJECTIONS about CONSENT

B) All men being born under government, they are to submit to that, and are not at liberty to begin a new one.

Nobody considered himself tied to a government without their consent
People take no notice of the given consent

they conclude they are NATURALLY subjects as they are men

EXAMPLES of men setting up new governments in other places

we should live in one universal monarchy if men have not been at liberty to separate

A man cannot bind by any compact his children

A child is born a subject of no country or government

A) There are no instances of a company of men independent and equal one amongst another, that met together and set up a government.

Idea of a government begun upon PATERNAL RIGHT
FALSE

Government = family // King = father

Monarchy = most obvious and simple form of government

If you grow up with a fatherly authority, generation by generation you TACITLY SUBMIT to it

When ambition and luxury increase the power of a prince, people restrain and prevent the abuses of that power

The reason that the monarchy continued was not because of the respect to paternal authority, since MONRCHIES have commonly been ELECTIVE

We hear not much of men in a state of nature. It is antecedent to records
EXAMPLES of people free and in the state of nature, that began a commonwealth:

Sparta, Rome, Venice, America (Peru)

Parallel: commonwealths = persons. Ignorant of their own births

CONSENT

One body to move one way

THE CONSENT OF THE MAJORITY
The body should move where the greater force carries it

the ACT of the MAJORITY = the ACT of the WHOLE

ORIGINAL COMPACT

By CONSENTING, every man puts himself under an OBLIGATION to everyone of that society: to submit to the DETERMINATION OF THE MAJORITY

One divests himself of his natural liberty by AGREEING with other men to unite into a community - VOLUNTARY UNION

WHY?
For the comfortable , safe and peaceable living one amongst another

No man can be exempted from the laws

END

ABSOLUTE MONARCHY / ABSOLUTE PRINCE

such a man is as much in the STATE OF NATURE as he is with the rest of mankind

A man would not be much better in a throne, where learning and religion justify his power.

LEGISLATIVE and EXECUTIVE POWER

NO JUDGE who decides FAIRLY, INDIFFERENTLY

KIND OF PROTECTION given by ABSOLUTE MONARCHY
example of the animals and the master
men devoured by lions

ORIGIN

an excellent man becomes a kind of natural authority
He became so by a TACIT CONSENT because of his wisdom

Then, the custom remained, but the successors became negligent

The properties were not secure under that government till the legislaive power was placed in collective bodies of men

The origin of the LEGISLATIVE and EXECUTIVE POWER

united into one body: with a common estailished LAW, an authority to decide controversies between them, and PUNISH OFFENDERS

punishment against the outsiders who have inflicted injuries

the power of war and peace

punishment against the nasty members of the society

the power of making laws
by a known and indifferent judge

AN ESSAY CONCERNING THE TRUE ORIGINAL, EXTENT AND END OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT chapters VII, VIII, IX, XIV

SOME MEN RENOUNCE TO THEIR NATURAL POWER AND RESIGNED IT UP INTO THE HANDS OF THE COMMUNITY = POLITICAL or CIVIL SOCIETY = COMMONWEALTH

Every single person became subject
A person authorizes the society to make laws for him, as the public good of the society shall require
can subsist ONLY if it has the power to PRESERVE the PROPERTY and PUNISH the offenders

MAN IN THE STATE OF NATURE

EQUALLY with other men will have A POWER given by nature
A POWER = to JUDGE of, and PUNISH the breaches of that law.
A POWER -> to preserve (against injuries of others) the PROPERTY*

*PROPERTY = life, liberty, estate

being born with a title to perfect FREEDOM, and an enjoyment of all the RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES of the law of nature
being all FREE, EQUAL and INDIPENDENT