WHAT DID I LEARN ABOUT JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE
JUDICIARY
MUST NOT INTERFERE THE SHARIAH COURT'S JURISDICTION
THIS CAN BE SEEN DUE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ARTICLE 121 (1A)
CASES THAT WE CAN SEE
SUBASHINI RAJASINGAM V SARAVANA THANGATHORAY
MEOR ATIQULRAHMAN V FATIMAH SIHI
HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE
CAN BE SEEN IN THE CASES LIKE DATUK HARUN V PP, DATO' MENTERI OTHMAN BAGINDA V DATO' SYED ALWI SYED IDRUS, KAMARIAH ALI V KERAJAAN NEGERI KELANTAN AND ETC
CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
IT IS NOT COMPULSORY TO REFER TO FOREIGN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
MUST BE PAR TO MALAYSIA
MUST INTERPRET THE LAW WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONSTITUTION
HAVE THE SECURITY OF THE JUDICIAL TENURE
THE TENURE OF THE JUDICIAL PART CAN ONLY BE DISCUSSED THE PARLIAMNET BASED ON A SUBSTANTIVE MOTION SUPPORTED BY THE QUARTER OF THE HOUSE
THIS CAN BE SEEN IN THE ARTICLE 125
THE JUDICIARY HAS A FORM OF GUARANTEES AGAINST PACKING
JUDICIARY(NOT EXECUTIVE) WILL DECIDE ABOUT WHO IS GOING TO HEAR THE CASE AND IT MUST
THIS IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE EXECUTIVE DOES NOT INTERFERE MUCH IN THE JUDICIARY
JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
THIS CAN BE SEEN IN THE ARTICLE 122B
THIS INCLUDES THE APPOINTMENT OF
JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
THE CHIEF JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT
THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
CHIEF JUSTICE F THE FEDERAL COURT
THE POWERS AND DUTIES
ADJUCATES THE DISPUTES BETWEEN
THE STATE AND THE FEDERATION
THE STATES
THE CITIZENS AND THE ORGANS OF STATE
THE CITIZENS
EXECUTIVE
CABINET
THE CABINET MAY RESIGN R DISMMISSED
MAY BE DISMISSED FROM THE OFFICE
MAY RESIGN AT ANY TIME
RESPONSIBILITIES
COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
ANSWERABILITY TO MONARCH
SECRECY
MAINTAINING CONFIDENCE
UNAMINITY
PARLIAMENTARY EXECUTIVE
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITIES
VOTE OF CENSURE
LEGISLATION
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MONARCH'S ACT
VICARIOUS LIABILITY
POLICY CULPABILITY
CAN BE APPOINTED OF EITHER HOUSE OF SENATES OR HOUSE OD REPRESENATATIVES
THE MEMBERS OF CABINET IS APPOINTED BY THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG BASED ON THE ADVICE OF THE PRIME MINISTERS
YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG
HE HAS 3 TYPES OF POWERS
RESIDUAL POWER
THIS POWER IS A DISCRETIONARY POWER THAT ARE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS
RIGHT TO DISMISS THE PRIME MINISTER
BY EXTRANEOUS FACTOR
BY EXTERNAL FACTOR
RIGHT TO AWARD HONOURS
RIGHT TO BE CONSULTED
NON-DISCRETIONARY POWER
THIS MEANS THAT THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG MUST ACT ACCORDINGLY TO THE ADVICE THAT HE RECEIVED
EXAMPLE
THE APPOINTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES
THIS CAN BE SEEN I THE ARTICLE 40(1) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
DISCRETIONARY POWER
THIS MEANS THAT THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG USES HIS MIND TO EXERCISE THE POWER GIVEN TO HIM
EXAMPLES
HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPOINT THE CARE TAKER OF THE GOVERNMENT WHEN IN A DISSOLUTION OF THE PARLIAMENT
REFUSING THE DISSOLUTION OF THE PARLIAMENT
THIS CAN BE SEEN IN THE ARTICLE 40(2) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
THIS MEANS THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG ONLY REIGNS BUT DOES NOT RULE
YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG IS A HEAD OF STATE
PUBLIC SERVICE BASED ON ARTICLE 132 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
THE JOINT PUBLIC SERVICE(ARTICLE 133 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION)
PUBLIC SERVICE OF EACH STATE
GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE OF THE FEDERATION
JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SERVICE
THE POLICE FORCE
EDUCATION SERVICE
ARMED FORCE
PRIME MINISTER
PRIME MINISTER MAY BE DISMISSED
IF THE PRIME MINISTER REFUSED TO RESIGN, THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGOMG
THE PRIME MINISTER CAN BE DISMISSED BY VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE OR WHEN HE LOSES THE MAJORITY CONFIDENCE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
THE PRIME MINSTER MAY RESIGN BY GIVING A RESIGNATION TO THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG
THE PRIME MINISTER NEEDS THE MAJORITY CONFIDENCE BY THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
THIS CAN BE COMPARED AND RATIONALIZED IN THE CASE OF TUN DATU HAJI MUSTAPHA BIN DATU HARUN v TUN DATUK HAJI MOHAMED ADNAN ROBERT
THE PRIMEMINISTER MUST COME FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
THE PRIME MINISTER CAN BE APPOINTED BY THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG AS STATED IN THE ARTICLE 43 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
THE FIRST ROLE OF A PRIME MINISTER IS TO BE THE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT