The distinction between good science and bad science lies in the adherence to proper scientific methodology. Good science rigorously tests hypotheses through experiments and embraces the possibility of being wrong, while bad science often avoids genuine attempts at falsification and relies on attractive presentations to mask poor methodologies.
Bad science rejects the rules of scientific thinking
far too much of it is wrapped up by very attractive presentations
Scientific thinking is the difference between good science and bad science
Bad presentation of bad science
The more the hypothesis forbids,the better the outcome is
An example is "N" rays which basically existed due to people's belief ...
The more there are doubts and skeptics on the experiment, the better the effect is
Refuting or counterarguing with the theory
Risky Predictions
Guesses
Risk Being Wrong
Having an A,B verifications , yet having a C falsification or vice versa but risking being wrong at one thing or more depending on the theory or experiment
Attempt that falsification can be made
Doing the experiment anyway, whether you will be right or wrong