Wi-Fi Radiaton Risks Disputes & Rebuttles

Plus de détails

The Estonian Health Care Museum

par Alexey Popov

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

par Milica Slijepcevic

Product: Frito-Lay (Doritos, Lays, etc.)

par Zia Mudassar

How effective was the 1848 Public Health Act?

par adam patel

Wi-Fi Radiaton Risks Disputes & Rebuttles

BBC PanoramaDocumenters

Argument: That Wi-FI beams are capable of causing hazardouseffects on humans

Efforts were to:

Cause an uproar throughout the public, and gain attention.

Plead that:

When the beam is at it's greatest intensity, it is harmful

Radiation emmited three times higher than that of a phone mast.

"70% of secondary schools fitted with Wi-Fi"Without sufficient data on the long term health risks

Scientists &Health Orgs

Defenders include:James Randerson ( Scientist)Paddy Regan (Scientist)Malcom Sperrin (Physicist )

Defence: Wi-Fi beams don't affect humans negativley, even long term.

Claim that:

Scientific Inverse law not respected, therefore all evidence compiled cannot be believed by scientists.

Argue that:

Wave levels are 600 times less dangerous than those considerded by those of government.

Thus it is a "scare story"

Data recorded incorrectly measured to that ofphone signals.

A Bogus comparison : "grossly unscientific"