Kategóriák: Minden - consensus - qualifications - sources - perspectives

a Jessica de Medeiros 5 napja

109

Assessing Credibility of Sources

When evaluating the credibility of a historical source, several factors must be considered. Firstly, it is essential to examine whether the author includes multiple perspectives in their work and if any viewpoints are excluded.

Assessing Credibility of Sources

Assessing Credibility of Sources

Does the author use a variety of sources when constructing their argument?

Does the author include multiple perspectives?

Are there any perspectives that are left out?

What relevant qualifications or experience does the author have?

Is the author's expertise connected to the subject?

What are other Historians saying about the author?

What is the general consensus among historians about the author's reliability?
Have other historians cited the author's work in their research?
Are there any criticisms or controversies surrounding the author?
Do other historians agree with the author's arguments?
Is the author well-respected among historians?
Who supports the author's credibility as a historian?
Positive or negative opinions about the author's work?
Are there any conflicting views on the author's credibility?

Does the author present alternative conclusions?

Are conflicting viewpoints discussed in the article?

What is the purpose of the source?

or provide evidence
entertain
persuade
How might the purpose of the source affect the content?

Does the author cite their research?

in-text citations are provided
Are the sources cited by the author reliable?