Categorieën: Alle - citations - evidence - ai - credibility

door luke jnekins 9 maanden geleden

52

CRAP

Two sources are evaluated for their credibility, relevance, and accuracy. The first source is authored by a well-regarded individual with numerous publications and is accessible through a reputable database like JSTOR, with the latest information from 2021.

CRAP

CRAP

Author is credible

His work is regularly featured in the Financial Times, Evening Standard, New York Times, The Telegraph, and Washington Post, and he is frequently a guest on BBC, RTE Irish National Radio, CNN, NPR, CSPAN, CNBC, Bloomberg, Fox, and The Wall Street Journal.

Posted on a seemingly non credible website

website took it from zeroedge.com in which they took it from daily reckoning

Source 1 "CRAP"

"P" - the author is trying to warn about the dangers of AI and what it could potentially cause in regards to the current state of the world.
"A" - listed below (where his works have been in regards to other reliable websites)
"R" Could'nt find any citations. Uses a healthy amount of fact and opinion
"C" - january 27th 2024

Article explains are the related terms and jargon and detail, to better help the reader understand the topic

Source clearly shows it's sources and references
Has high quality evidence and information

Source 2

Source comes from a credible database(JSTOR)
Author is credible(many publications)
The source is current, as recent as 2021