door Christine Daviault 8 jaren geleden
115
Meer zoals dit
Is this where we introduce the scenario? I think it might be. Perhaps as a recap of section 1, making linkages to the scenario?
In conversation with Paul, he and I were not sure if it made sense to make an activity or actual "content content" out of these. I think that 1.4 and 1.5 feel more like a resources page or a series of "terms you should know".
Here is a definition section.. see below for my thoughts about this.
This whole section feels like it could be presented on screen as a sort of rollover/or on click definition "activity lite".
Also I think this could be a matching/decision tree sort of activity. With our first, brief, intro of the concepts of risk management, risk mitigation, management of people (resources) and money as well as assuring outcomes
I am not totally sure, but I think this is where we dig into the scenario for real. I'm not sure if this is were we introduce it or not.. thoughts?
Here I would suggest going with a definition of the three things (as a review partially) and the a matching exercise. Moodle can handle it natively.
Here we give them some light case studies, with an emphasis on (for now, in this iteration) NZ or Australasian examples.
Same as above. Cold, hard facts and move on.
The goal here is to show link things they know in their day to day life (Planning a trip etc) to the scenario. It is to show them that, in an informal way, they already know about management
Pile obviously
no lets keep it at pie :)
This is a matching exercise I think. Basically the idea is that we teach via the formative feed back. So we have a series of projects and a series of BAU and we get them to match them to the correct pie.
Definitions are, by their nature, pretty prescriptive, I was thinking we present them a video or a short text to read and move them along to the next bits ASAP.
