Categorii: Tot - law - confidentiality - implementation - duty

realizată de Jamie Marshall 17 ani în urmă

692

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

The primary focus revolves around the intersection of confidentiality and the legal duty to warn in the context of communicable diseases. Various landmark cases such as Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California are referenced to illustrate the judicial stance on these matters.

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

The Duty to Warn

Communicable Diseases

HM Advocate v Kelly (unreported)

R v Dica [2005] EWCA Crim 2304

Partner Notification, e.g. New York

C.W. v. Cooper Health System (2006)

Santa Rosa Healthcare Corporation v. Garcia (1998)

Di Marco v Lynch Homes - Chester County Inc. (1989)

Physical Harm
United States

Molien v Kaiser Foundation Hospital (1980)

United Kingdom

W v Edgell [1989] 1 All ER 1089

The Law of Confidentiality

European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Article 10
European Convention on Human Rights
Z v. Finland (1998) 25 EHRR 371
Article 8
Article 3
Article 2
Professional Guidance
British Medical Association

Medical Ethics Today

Department of Health

Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice

General Medical Council

Protecting and Providing Information

Hippocratic Oath
Statutes
Health and Social Care Act 2001
AIDS (Control) Act 1987
Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984
NHS Trusts and Primary Care Trusts (Sexually Transmitted Diseases) Directions 2000
NHS (Venereal Diseases) Regulations 1974
Data Protection Act 1998
Common Law
R v. Dica [2004] EWCA Crim 1231
Ashworth Security Hospital v. MGN Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 515
Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California (1976) 17 Cal (3d) 358
W v Edgell [1990] 1 All ER 835
H (A Healthcare Worker) v Associated Newspapers Ltd and N (A Health Authority) [2002] LLMLR 210
Campbell v MGN [2004] UKHL 22
R v Department of Health ex parte Source Informatics Ltd [2001] QB 424 (CA)
X v Y [1988] 2 All ER 649

Normative Aspects of Confidentiality

Trust

Bassford, HIV and Confidentiality

Patients literally and metaphorically in their doctor's hands

GMC Guidance on genetics

Crucial to a successful doctor-patient relationship

Consequences

Consequences for third party

Debiliting, terminal illness

Morally wrong?

Utilitarianism

Breaching confidentiality leads to less people seeking treatment - more harmful

Confidentiality is crucial to controlling the HIV/AIDS epidemic

Stigma of a diagnosis of AIDS

Plague, SARS, Quarantine in Canada

Historical examples

Patients may not seek treatment if no guarantee of confidentiality

Autonomy
Applied in the abstract to communicable diseases

Contrast with consent

Can limit autonomy to protect others

Autonomy of the patient vs. autonomy of the third party

General

G Dworkin, "The Theory and Practice of Autonomy"

Five criteria for a workable definition of autonomy

Many definitions of autonomy

JS Mill, "On Liberty"

Harm principle

Recommendations

Possible Implementation into UK Law
Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994]
White v Jones [1995]
Smith v Littlewoods Organization Ltd [1987]
Goodwill v B.P.A.S. [1996]
Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990]
Pittmann Estate v Bain (1994)
Imposition of Legal Duty to Warn
Osman v UK [1999]
Gammil v United States (1984)
Thomson v County of Alameda (1980)
Di Marco v Lynch Homes-Chester County (1990)
Myers v Queensberry (1983)
Reisner v Regents of the University of California (1995)
Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California (1976)
R v Dica [2004]