по julia porter 3 лет назад
192
Больше похоже на это
involves what the people involve their wants and needs
A person can tend to think the substantive problem lies in conflicting positions. Other people in a dispute can tend to negotiate using positions.
The problem that is being argued is usually between two closed-minded people.
In a "person problem" its attacking the person, but attacking the problem
Put yourself in the other person's shoes, and making sure you are understanding the other person's point of view
If you want to influence them, you also need to understand empathetically their point of view.
Understanding their point of view is not the same as agreeing with it. Try and be open minded about their side of the problem.
Conclusion: the other side feels as though their needs and emotions have been acknowledged and met, the person should strike the problem instead of the people
What is a person?
A person is an individual with emotions, feelings, wants, needs, and ego
An ego is a person's sense of self-esteem or self-importance.
Don’t focus on yours or the other sides imperfections, not one person is truly perfect.
Emotions: natural instinctive state of mind deriving from one's circumstances, mood, or relationships with others
When some feels like they have been attacked they can give off passive aggressiveness or be defensive in an arguement
The person may feel upset and now have a negative view of themselves because their ego has shrunk
People from each side should focus on the other's interests and try to find a mutual compromise.
Parties may tend to lash out at each other, when in reality, they should be trying to come together and attack the problem itself.
For example: if one person wants to eat at Olive Garden and another person wants to eat at Chili’s, separating the person from the problem would mean focusing only on the main problem (where to eat) without becoming distracted by previous conflicts or ongoing tensions in the relationship.
Separating the person from the problem would not include referencing where the pair has eaten before, who made this decision, or who usually decides where they eat.