Distinguishing between good and bad science hinges on adherence to rigorous scientific thinking. Good science embraces falsification, making risky predictions that can be proven wrong, and values skepticism and doubt as tools for refining theories.
Bad science rejects the rules of scientific thinking
far too much of it is wrapped up by very attractive presentations
Scientific thinking is the difference between good science and bad science
Bad presentation of bad science
The more the hypothesis forbids,the better the outcome is
An example is "N" rays which basically existed due to people's belief ...
The more there are doubts and skeptics on the experiment, the better the effect is
Refuting or counterarguing with the theory
Risky Predictions
Guesses
Risk Being Wrong
Having an A,B verifications , yet having a C falsification or vice versa but risking being wrong at one thing or more depending on the theory or experiment
Attempt that falsification can be made
Doing the experiment anyway, whether you will be right or wrong