类别 全部

作者:Johana Perez 2 年以前

168

A1. Perez Johana.Epistemological bases.

El pragmatismo es una corriente filosófica que enfatiza la relación entre teoría y práctica, abordando problemas prácticos a través de operaciones activas y experimentación. Destaca la importancia de la práctica experimental y la investigación en la producción de conocimiento, considerando que el conocimiento surge de la acción humana y debe ser justificado por sus consecuencias y utilidad social.

A1. Perez Johana.Epistemological bases.

Bibliographic references

Tekin, A.K., & Kotaman, H. (2013). The Epistemological Perspectives on Action Research 1. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 81-81.

Oquist, P. (1978). The Epistemology of Action Research. Acta Sociologica, 21(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937802100204

Oquist, P. (1978). The Epistemology of Action Research. Acta Sociologica, 21(2), 143–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194229

Epistemological bases.

Action research
is not accepted
Observation

It does not resolve all disputes.

Man

Eliminate the "patently absurd"

Reduces the area of the possible but does not exhaust it

Scientific knowledge

Purpose

Guide the practice

Produces the knowledge that justifies the knowledge itself.

Investigation process

Results

Discarded hypotheses

Scientific theories

Correctable and attempts

Test hypothesis

Universe of phenomena

Concepts and theoretical presuppositions

Generate

Events and facts

Hypothesis

Previous investigation

Empirical theory

Control

Of variables

Becomes

Facts and events

Definitions

Theoretical presuppositions

Concepts

Answers to leading questions

Hypothesis testing

Directive questions

Conceivable origin

Scientific research is not necessary

Different realities and interpretations

Not considered research scientific.

Not related to scientific censorship.
Activity

Cultural

Social

Religious

Political practice

Knowledge production
Final score

Laws

They meet the conditions

Universal and immutable

Error source

Intentional modification

Requires

They justify the modification

Goal setting judgments

Value criteria

Does not constitute science

Involuntary modification

Disrupts real and natural relationships

Research study object

Human interpretation

Needs to

Practice of rigorous observation

The facts speak for themselves

Theory and practice are not related
The man
Justify knowledge
Produces knowledge

Direct observation

Neutral observation

Free of values

Epistemology of a reality and true knowledge
Relativism
Separation does not respond to focus
Confuses

Objects of Knowledge and real objects

Center

Exists

Free of all values

Superstructures of a society.

Scientific practice

Inside the thought.

Cualitative

Specific practices

Transform their object types

Materiales, en productos finales

Subtopic

Mode of production

Ideological myth.

Does not exist

General practice

Fully material practice

Absolute vision

Pure theory

Reality

There is an independent entity of knowledge

Does not form the object of knowledge

Distinction

Occurs

Dentro del pensamiento

It has its own internal object

Appropriate reality

It happens by itself

Justification

Method

Internal protocols

Product quality validation

It is characterized by mode or method of reflection

Produces

Concrete thought

Not to be confused with the concrete reality

Tentative and correctable

Knowledge effect

Confrontation

Facts and concepts

Define the problems

Abstract knowledge

Comes from any source

Ideological practice.

Corresponds to the focal point of the pragmatism
Goal
It evokes the relationship between values and science.
Separación entre saber y hacer
Experimental practice

Union of knowledge and reality

Accountability

Originan la investigación

Justification of knowledge
Eventual for human activity.
Recognizes that knowledge
Consequences of an operation.
Knowledge production
Science

Indicates

Operationalism or instrumentalism.

Directed activity

Random place

Behaviour

Values are purposes

Practical problems
Knowledge
Disrupts "natural" relationships
It arises from human action.
Defined by active operations
Defined by active operations

Dialectical materialism

Action research
Produces knowledge based on a concrete social context.
Theory and practice
Practice

Active, critical and creative intelligence of man.

Natural and social environment,

Be guided by theory

Theory

Action

It does not have value

Human interact intentionally

Relevant theory

Generate the desired results

Guide practice

Justification of knowledge
it is not a fixed event.
Problem resolution
Social utility
Concrete social praxis
Materialism
Men

Human intelligence

Creative

Selective

Criticism

Active

Shaped by its natural surroundings and Social

Theoretical framework

Social concepts and interrelationships

Guide social analysis

Sensory experience

Directly and neutrally

Rejects ontological and extranatural elements
Idealism
Active mind
Hangover are rejected
Creation like that of the Judeo-Christian tradition.
Epistemological bases
Pragmatism
Logical positivism
Structuralism
Empiricism