if not caused by human actions then humans shouldn't sacrifice to reverse natural change
Climate Change CIVICS
SPEAKER ANOTE TANG
believes that bigger countries need to cut more
bigger countries will suffer most financially
bigger countries will have to sacrifice more
hesitant; financial wealth and current industry could decline
left wing
firm believer in fighting
against climate change
made political decisions with climate change
and environment in mind
reduced fishing industry, increasing
cost for incoming vessels
COMPROMISE
countries will have to sacrifice and adapt to new changes
sacrifice of business, industry, for sake
of planet's health
everyone has to come
together to solve this
global issue=global solution
Immediate Action
immediate efforts should
be taken
Solution
raise awareness (e.g. implement into education system)
appeal to government on this issue
elect a GOVERNMENT
that will fight against this
reduce industry work;
cut emissions
Real
is unnatural, needs to be reversed
climate change is real and is
the result of human actions
Left Wing (Liberal)
want to focus more on cutting industry
and helping the environment
Independent Responsibility
countries should decide their own efforts
risk of not knowing whether contributions
are enough
not every country can make the same
efforts; heavily industry reliant countries
will have to give up more
countries all want to sacrifice the
same amount; fear of reducing the
industry and economic wealth of a country
Not Real
no change to fight climate change
continue industry development
is natural; not due to human actions
Not Severe
"will die down over time"
is not "drastic"
Right Wing (Conservative)
industry>humanity's survival
