Luokat: Kaikki - fluorescence - constructivist - cézanne

jonka diyar hozaien 11 vuotta sitten

120

assi5a

There is an ongoing debate among art historians and scientists regarding the authenticity of a painting attributed to Cézanne. Historians point to several stylistic similarities between the disputed piece and other known works by the artist, such as parallel hatched brushstrokes and the composition indicative of his constructivist phase.

assi5a

Is the Cézanne a fake?

Art hisorians

Disagree
same visual elements

composition charactristic of his constructivist phase

Brushwork charactrized by same paralell hatched brushstrokes

unsigned
very similar to a Pennsylvania Cézanne

Scientists' input

disagree
flouresence data show same hand-ground pigment used in Brooklyn Cézanne
XFR show that pigment used was widely used during Cézanne's life span
Agree
IR show underpainting
IR show pigment that was only avaible after Cézanne died
UV spectrum suggests that it is older than a hundred years old

Mindomo

Lisätietoja Mindomosta
Ohje
Yhteydenotto
Hinnoittelu
Julkinen Mielikartat -galleria
Mielikarttamallit

Lisää tietoja

Blogi
Käyttöehdot
Tietosuojakäytäntö
Security
Accessibility
Security Policy

Ukk

Mitä miellekartoitus oikein on?
Luo ajatuskartta verkossa
Esimerkiksi käsitekarttoja
Mikä on käsitekartoitus?
Mitä käsitekartoitus oikein on?