jonka Joseph Cavallo 9 vuotta sitten
324
Lisää tämän kaltaisia
You can delete this topic from your saved Mindomo map.
Things you can try when you get stuck, lose direction or encounter a problem in the brainstorming process.
These are just a few of many different approaches that you can use to destabilise an unproductive discussion. You can find many more on line. You can add your own here or even delete any that you dislike.
Identify the assumptions in the scenario, then reverse them to see how it changes the scenario and ideas.
Select a famous person with marked character traits. What would they do in this situation?
Inject random words from a newspaper into the scenario description. to see how this changes the ideas around it
How could this problem be solved in a completely different environment?
Is it like anything else that has been solved in a different way?
Instead of asking "How can we solve X?", ask "How many ways can we achieve Y?" Assume that there are multiple solutions and you just need to find a few. This small difference in language can make a big difference to thinking.
Think from six distinct perspectives with Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats:
- White Hat: focus on facts
- Yellow Hat: be optimistic
- Black Hat: be judgmental and look for problems
- Red Hat: react emotionally, have hunches and intuitions
- Green Hat: be creative and look for possibilities
- Blue Hat: thinking about thinking
If you are trying to solve a problem that has symptoms, think in reverse. What could you to to make things worse, not better? What would have the biggest effect? What is the worst outcome you could achieve?
Can you reverse that thinking again to find a solution?
Ask a participant to justify one of their ideas. The discussion may spark some alternatives.
What are the forces acting on this situation? Can you change the balance of forces?
Focus on the gap between where you are now and where you want to be. How can that gap be changed? What would make it even bigger?
Challenge and push each other in pairs rather than in a group. You might get more insightful and honest inputs.
List the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the scenario to highlight any unexplored aspects
Scale the problem or opportunity up or down by 1000. How would you deal with it if it were 1000 times bigger or 1000 time smaller?
What would happen if you did the exact opposite of the sensible answer?
Take a break from the process and let ideas incubate. You may get more energy from the group tomorrow morning, or after doing something completely different.
How does the scenario look to other people? Think and act like competitors, customers, enemies, friends, experts, uninformed people, different ages, different genders, people at different levels in the organisation, people in different industries. Decide whether the situation depends on your point of view.
Pick some key words from the ideas and find associated words. Do they lead to anything different?
Define the rules that govern a process or situation. then try to break them or get around them
Gather ideas anonymously, and vote on them
Review the scenario again and challenge it.
- What assumptions have been made?
- Might it be incomplete or incorrectly described?
- It is really the situation, or is there something else behind it?
- Why and how has this situation arisen?
Make sure that you are consistent in your criteria when evaluating ideas. It is common for an idea to be rejected for a reason that has not been applied to all ideas. Do not reject an idea for a specific reason unless that criteria has been used from the beginning of your evaluation. If you realise that your criteria are incomplete, you may need to restart your evaluation.
Groupthink can lead to loss of potentially valuable input, and poor joint decisions. It occurs when:
- A strong person influences others with their opinions or behaviour
- People stay silent when they disagree
- The group believes it must be right because of who it is
- There is strong external pressure to go in a particular direction
- There is little diversity of knowledge and backgrounds in the group
- Consensus is based on lack of objections rather than on positive support
- Some favourite ideas get attention without much consideration of alternatives
Make sure your group is exploring possibilities without judgement, and that all inputs are treated equally. Use some of the other tools to break down groupthink.
Follow up on the actions and keep your team informed. Do not let brainstorm sessions disappear quietly, otherwise there will be less interest in participating next time.
If your session has generated some worthwhile directions, set out the next actions. If there has been no result, then you may need to adopt your contingency plan. Think about:
- Developing ideas further
- Feasibility studies
- Obtaining support from other stakeholders
- Detailed design
- Prototypes or wire frame mockups
- Trials and tests
Now you can start to filter ideas against your criteria, and use the criteria to improve them.
If you are capturing ideas in your Mindomo map, use icons or priority markers to prioritise ideas.
If you end up with nothing to pursue, improve your scenario description and criteria, and go around again or at another session after people have had time to think things over.
Brief your team on the minimum criteria for filtering ideas. This may involve challenging the scenario again, as they might not agree with all the criteria.
Criterion
Give participants some time to reflect on the ideas generated, before evaluating them. New ideas and insights can arise after some time away from the session.
Without evaluating or judging, build upon the ideas from other people, using them as triggers for different ideas.
This is why it is essential to avoid evaluating ideas. A strange idea could be impractical, but might be a stepping stone to something that is practical.
Group similar or related ideas together. Look for emerging patterns and gaps created by patterns.
Gather ideas from all participants, avoiding unnecessary repetition of identical input.
You can gather ideas in this map as floating topics, which helps to avoid the implicit prioritisation of lists. It also makes them easy to rearrange afterwards.
If you get stuck, try some of the tools in this toolbox.
Rules
- Do not prioritise or evaluate ideas when gathering them. Do not suppress ideas because they are too strange or obscure. Censure anyone who does this directly or indirectly.
- Do not attach ideas to people. Ideas become owned by the group when they are submitted.
- Aim for sheer quantity, not quality.
- Keep on track and keep the objective and the scenario in mind all the time. Limit off-topic discussions that will never rejoin the main thread.
Give participants some time to come up with individual ideas. These can often get lost in group discussions.
Give participants some time to think about the problem. Initial reactions can often change after some incubation time.
Brief the team on:
1. The objective for this session
2. The time constraints
3. The scenario
4. The contingency plan
5. The process that you will be following, and the rules at each stage.
The contingency plan is the route that you will take if nothing better can be found.
The design brief, problem or opportunity that this session is addressing
The objective of this brainstorming session
The foundations of a successful brainstorming session are:
-> A clear objective
-> A well-defined problem or opportunity
-> A group that understands the brainstorming process
-> Follow-up and action
The advantage of making these visible in a map is that everyone can see the plan and rules, and can refer back here to resolve blockages or loss of direction.
