Luokat: Kaikki - disclosure - confidentiality - legal - ethics

jonka Sarah Maybin 14 vuotta sitten

160

Group 4 Project Medicine and the Law

Confidentiality in medicine is a pivotal concern, underscored by the Hippocratic Oath and the common law duty to maintain patient trust. Despite the lack of a unified statutory body governing this confidentiality, the debate persists on whether the relaxation of these rules is justifiable.

Group 4 Project Medicine and the Law

Group 4 Project: Medicine and the Law

The relaxation of the rules on confidentiality- Is it justifiable ?

???
Family
Disclosure to sexual partner

Position if person at risk is also a patient of the Dr. (Special relationship)

Australia (PD v Harvey and Chen) Disclosing as last resort

US and Canada- Statutory duty to inform person at risk

No decison in the UK

General Medical Council and Institute of Medical Ethics (Guidance)

Disclosure of infected health worker( X v Y and H v Associated Newspapers Limited)
Heath Authority Duty to Report (Aids Control Act 1987)
Confidentiality and the deceased
Guidance from Genreral Medical Council
General Duty continues after death

Exceptions to Confidence

Statutory
Public Interest
Press Freedom
Medical Research
Preventing or detecting crime
Family (Child Protection)
HIV
Consent

Arguments in favour/against confidentiality?

Against
May be better for the protection of the patient
favour
Aids an effective health care system
Best medical care can be given because patient will be honest

Duty of Confidence

Hippocratic Oath
Not a single statute or common law body of laws governing confidentiality
Patients may be unwilling to disclose
Common Law Duty