Luokat: Kaikki - sociology - lessons

jonka Cassandra González Romero 6 vuotta sitten

212

History in IR

The scholarly article explores the conceptualization of history within the field of international relations, contrasting constructionist and deconstructionist theories. While constructionism emphasizes structured theoretical frameworks to explain global phenomena, deconstructionism challenges these grand narratives, advocating for a more nuanced understanding.

History in IR

Theories: Particularism

A01552189 Cassandra Gonzalez Romero Lawson, George and Hobson, John M. (2008) What is history in international relations? Millennium - journal of international studies, 37 (2). pp. 415-435. DOI: 10.1177/0305829808097648

E.H. Carr: Explain the difference between HHS and the other models

Between: Constructionist (Mega-Macro) and descontructionist

Provides: The antithesis of the grand scale constructionism of the mega-macro approach

Based on: Literary work is considered as a product of a particular time and place

Theories: Desconstructionism

Convinced: There is a world out there that can be explained via considered theorical templates

A01552189 Cassandra Gonzalez Romero

Lawson, George and Hobson, John M. (2008) What is history in international relations? Millennium - journal of international studies, 37 (2). pp. 415-435. DOI: 10.1177/0305829808097648

Mode of history that underpins neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism within IR

History takes the role of "scripture"

Application of inviolate "lessons" that can be used as current policy

Provides: -Rich stream of data, Lessons

Theories: Constructionism, Neorealism, neoliberal

History in IR

Radical Historicism

Historicist Historical Sociology

Traditional History

History without historicism