A Legal Translator’s Reality

Plus de détails

Trust

par Sachin Shukla

Leadership Skills

par Inderpreet Sidhu

Human Standstill

par Alexander Refsum Jensenius

Reference Materials

par Linda Drake

A Legal Translator’s Reality

Reality

“An acceptable legal translation is one that contains correctly translated terms, utterances that have been translated correctly according to their pragmatic function, and textual conventions that are familiar to the intended readers of target texts and conform with target-language genre conventions” (Nielsen 2010: 33)

“Our profession is based on knowledge and experience. It has the longest apprenticeship of any profession. Not until thirty do you start to be useful as a translator; not until fifty do you start to be in your prime.”

Challenge

In the case of translation into or out of English, legal translation is often an operation between two languages as well as two legal systems

The challenges can be categorized

translation-specific

constraints of bilingual processing such as interference, simplification and explicitation

language-specific

semantic differences between languages

legal system-specific

incongruity of legal terms and difference between legal systems

Legal translation is the “ultimate linguistic challenge […] combining the inventiveness of literary translation with the terminological precision of technical translation,”

Opinions

Łucja proceeded to tackle some of the facets within legal translation that we need to consider

Delegates were introduced to examples of set legal formula

e.g. in witness whereof

terms and their collates

such as to bring an action and to file a lawsuit

the legal vs. semi-legal nature of terms, variation in terminology for civil and criminal procedure, geographical variations

UK vs. US law or even English and Welsh law vs. Scots law

the wide usage of synonyms

par/nominal/face value, for example

To put any fears to bed, Łucja asserted that legal translators are unlikely to be replaced by machine translation and post-editors soon, not least because of confidentiality issues and the lack of parallel corpora to train software.

Problems

Translators out of English, on the other hand, need to recognise these and more than likely simplify them in their target language, as continental systems avoid synonymy and a redundant translation would be confusing to a continental lawyer.

“The problem that legal translation is not viewed as a profession compared with an airline pilot or doctor, for example…"