Catégories : Tous - evaluation - contingency - alternatives - information

par Nur Shahira Kamal Il y a 8 années

398

MGM4139 CHP11 STRATEGY MONITORING

Organizations often need significant adjustments following the evaluation phase to enhance strategic responsiveness. Contingency planning plays a crucial role in this by ensuring preparedness and adaptability in the face of unexpected changes.

MGM4139 CHP11 STRATEGY MONITORING

Visible or Hidden

Sun Tzu: Strategies is secret

War based on deception
Strategy cant be duplicated
Less attractive to rival
Limit critisicm
Free disemination

Business Organisation prefer Visible

Reason
Cant implement strategy well
Inhibit commitment
Inhibit understanding
Secret inhibit communication
Advantages
Enhance commitment,understanding + communication
Democracy
Full support
All staff involve

Art or Science

Mintzberg's notion : More as Arts

Politics
Creativity
Hunch
Emotion

More as Science

Research
Access Internal + External environment
Decide action
Perform analysis
Pros + cons alternative

Top-Down or Bottom-Up

'Top-Dowm'

Top executive makes decision

'Bottom-Up'

Manager + employee involve in decision making

MGM4139 CHP11 STRATEGY MONITORING

The Process of Evaluating Strategies

Organizational members should involved.
Managers and employees shold be aware of the firm's progress
Example : If the assumptions made are deviate significantly from forecast, then a change or renew in Strategy-Formulation is needed.
Performed in CONTINUING BASIS
NOT in the end of specific time or when problems occurred.
Should
Stimulate creativity in generating ALTERNATIVES & CRITERIA of EVALUATION
Trigger a review of OBJECTIVES & VALUES
Initiate managerial questions of EXPECTATION & ASSUMPTIONS.

21st-Century Challenges in Strategic Management

Auditing

Reason of switching standards from GAAP to IFRS
IFRS rules are more streamlined and less complex than GAAP
New standard - International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Old standard - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
A systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence - assert and communicate the results to interested users

Contingency Planning

Five-step process of effective Contingency Planning
Determine early warning trigger points key contingency events
Develop contingency plans for key contingency events
Determine the expected pros and cons of each contingency events
Determine when the events occur
Identify events that could jeopardize strategies
Benefits of Contingency Planning
It made managers more adaptable the changes
It prevent panic in crisis situations
It permit quick response to change
The organization need a major change after the evaluation phase - thus, can promote a strategist's ability to respond quickly
Alternative plans that can take into action if certain strategy/plan do not occur as expected

Characteristics of an Effective Evaluation System

Do not dominate decision
Provide current situation
Simple
Provide timely info
Meaningful to managers
Adequate control
Adequate info
Economical

Published Sources of Strategy-Evaluation Information

Dun's Business Month
Industry Week
Businessweek
Fortune
Innovativeness
Product quality
Quality of management
Financial soundness
Global competitiveness
Social responsibilty
Long-term investment
Use of assets
People management

The Balanced Scorecard

aims to balance:
Internal & External
Financial & Nonfinancial
Long terms & short terms
allows firms to evaluate strategies
6 Key issues

financial

business ethics/natural environment

community/social responsibility

operations processes

managers/employees

customers

from 4 prospectives

Learning and growth

customer knowledge

internal business processes

financial performance

Strategy Evaluation Framework

Reviewing Bases of Strategy
S-W-O-T of the current strategies shoud be continually monitored for a better change
Develop a revised IFE and EFE Matrices -to prevent any upcoming failures toward the organization's objectives
Measuring Organizational Performance
Strategy evaluation based on

Qualitative criteria

Quantitative criteria

Activities

Examining progress

Evaluating individual performance

Investigating deviations from plans

Comparing expected results to actual results

Taking Corrective Action
Outsource (or rein in) business functions
Allocate resources differently
Add or terminate salespersons, employees or managers
Raise capital with stock or debt
Install new performance incentives
Devise new policies
Alter policies
Revise Objectives
Alter the firm's vision or mission
Divest a division
Replace one or more key individuals
Alter the firm's structure

The Nature of Strategy Evaluation

Difficulties
Decreasing time span for planning certainty
Domestic and global events
Rate of obsolescence of plans
Increasing number of variables
Difficulty predicting future with accuracy
Increase in environment’s complexity
Rumelt 4 Criteria
Consonance
Advantage
Feasibility
Consistency
Appraisal of Strategic Performance
Profit margins, ROI, & EPS ratios increased
Increase in productivity
Increase in sales
Increase in profitability
Have assets increased
3 Basic Activities
Corrective actions
Compare expected to actual results
Examine the underlying bases of a firm’s strategy
Strategy Evaluation
Overemphasis can be costly & counterproductive
Complex & sensitive undertaking
Erroneous strategic decisions can have severe negative impact on organizations
Alert management to potential/actual problems in a timely fashion
Vital to the organization’s well-being