da Addison Cook manca 1 anno
58
Più simili a questo
The act has specific requirements and practices for waste disposal, chemical enforcement, and cleanup enforcement.
https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/waste-chemical-and-cleanup-enforcement
Compliance and monitoring of the generation, life cycle, and disposal of wastes.
Monitoring is done for both hazardous waste and non-hazardous solid waste
There is continued research on:
There have been three amendments to the act so far.
https://www.epa.gov/rcra/history-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra#history
Concerning effectiveness, through evaluation there were shown to be loopholes in which the amendments and increased regulatory power helped to impact.
https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1196&context=pelr
This amendment interestingly created forms of flexibility for certain situations in which there can be land disposal.
This amendment strengthened the power of the EPA to enforce the regulations and requirements specifically in federal facilities.
The first amendment was to phase out specifically land disposal of hazardous waste and to create a process for corrective action.
This can show enforcement for big companies that do not properly dispose of their solid land waste or hazardous waste. Just recently UPS was fined for not precisely land disposing of hazardous or compromised packages.
https://apnews.com/article/trending-news-puerto-rico-business-government-and-politics-hazardous-waste-d3cee4c991eada888899ea62b47ef389
Stakeholders such as people in of power in local and state communities as well as different land owners, companies, and corporations are the ones that are able to push for changes.
Scientists helped evaluate specifically changes in policy because of land disposal and improper lining of disposal dump areas. There were shown to be sorts of loopholes for companies to not truly dispose of waste correctly without truly being held responsible and. given appropriate consequences. With this evaluation though, amendments and alterations were made not just because of scientists but people that deserved fair disposal and the effectiveness has greatly increased. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1196&context=pelr
Companies and corporations evaluate what is doable for them under specific regulations and requirements.
https://www.epa.gov/rcra/resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra-overview
Non-hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
The RCRA was an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal act of 1965. Because of the increased awareness of toxic waste, RCRA as an amendment addresses solid waste and toxic waste.
With more awareness of bad toxic waste disposal practices, their became an observed need not just to regulate toxic waste in the disposal process but also in the substances generation all the way to disposal.
It was seen that toxic waste does not become a problem or can negatively impact things during the disposal process but that regulation is important cradle to grave. Solid waste disposal was seen as something that needed to be regulated because of the increase in amounts, and this act helped bring together both hazardous and non-hazardous waste
https://www.epa.gov/history/epa-history-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act