by Bill Lyons 17 years ago
469
More like this
SLC CAN & US: $253M per year (Salary, OT, fringe, Payroll Taxes)
$9M in consuting expenses in 2006
$1.7M in IT
Approx. 4% of overall manpower expenses
Review DC formula
Phasing-out options for older employees
Generous enough face to the market?
Upward pressure on base Comp. due to scarcity
Introduce skils-based pay?
How do we reduce our dependance on external hires?
Market Driven
Total Comp. Strategy
Compa-ratio SLC: 1
HUS: ?
Avg. Comp: 70K
$2.4 M salaryincrease 2007 (3.5%)
We are currently 5% to 10% under our target policy postion (we are supposed to ba at 65% but we are at 55% of our target position)
Is our Comp. policy correct?
Keep 65% policy bu correct it with the variable compensation part?
Do we have this discipline to go this way?
Subtopic
Should we segment our Comp. policy by employee category?
Is off-shoring or outsourcing an option?
Increase Comp to stay competitive?
Compress Comp. to preserve EBDTDA?
WSIB
Harmonization
Focus on segments
25% of our costs relate to Hourly overtime ($13M of OT on $48M base)
What explains the significant reduction of OT over the last 3 years?
Local control & management
Use management rights correctly
Are there portions of OT that we have control over?
Introduced Skills-based pay?
No gains realy possible
Through traditional HER Means
Communications sub-strategy
Build trust with local Union executives
Nobodies?
Partners?
Enemies?
Build links with central Union office
International context
Global competition
Coaching
Win-Win model
Management rights
Personel scheduling
Ratio of FTEs VS contractors
Work organization
Performance management
Multiskilling
Manpower planning / forcasting
Go further with past investements
Portfolio management
Priority & capacity planning
Realize project promises
Build accountability
Optimize organizational structure
Less siloed
Encourage flexibility and adaptability
Historical budgeting pratices VS zero based
Review spans of control
Empowerment
Multi Skilling
Autonomous teams
Encourage Internal Mobility
Redefine organizational performance
Focus on key initiatives / Don't get sidetracked
Learn to deal with performance issues directly
Without being politicaly correct
With honesty
Clearly
Redefine individual performance
Review double-dipping problem