por John Valentich 10 anos atrás
329
Mais informações
por Claudia Vasquez beltran
por CHRISTIAN OBED LOPEZ CABRERA
por Christian Melone
por Kevfire Kevfire
Whereas
as the icon is "other but like," the phantasm only appears to look like the thing it copies because of the "place" from which we view it. Plato's dialogue goes on to call into question the status of this image of an original, for if it is not the original we see, it must be something else—a simulacrum, a false claimant to being. The Platonic task is therefore to distinguish, in Gilles Deleuze's terms, "between good and bad copies, or rather copies (always well founded) and simulacra (always engulfed in dissimilarity)."
The complex associations of language making (sophistry) and image making (mimesis) in Platonic philosophy (Rosen 1983) go beyond the subject
jjjjj
juju
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s20/sh/a780696d-4482-41db-9656-e14025dfbe39/64df92c9c2fc3901321f9d94463af9e5
note 3
Whereas the icon is "other but like," the phantasm only appears to look like the thing it copies because of the "place" from which we view it. Plato's dialogue goes on to call into question the status of this image of an original, for if it is not the original we see, it must be something else—a simulacrum, a false claimant to being. The Platonic task is therefore to distinguish, in Gilles Deleuze's terms, "between good and bad copies, or rather copies (always well founded) and simulacra (always engulfed in dissimilarity)." The complex associations of language making (sophistry) and image making (mimesis) in Platonic philosophy (Rosen 1983) go beyond the subject
jjjjj
juju
Now is the email
zeke1509