Preços Iniciar Sessão Cadastre-se

Categorias: Todos - epidemiology - economics - law - sociology

por Marina Rachel 10 anos atrás

375

interdisciplinary studies

The debate over whether a distribution model or an exchange model is better for intravenous drug users involves multiple considerations. Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize negative outcomes associated with drug use, including disease prevalence and rates of infection like HIV and HCV.

Mais informações

Experiment vs Non-Experimental Methods

por Elizabeth Roraback

Organigrama arbol

por BRENDA SIMONE ENRIQUEZ JARRIN

INTEREST GROUPS: SPANISH ABORTION NEW LAW

por Alfonso Bauluz

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

por Jamie Marshall

Harm Reduction

interdisciplinary studies

The debate over whether a distribution model or an exchange model is better for intravenous drug users involves multiple considerations. Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize negative outcomes associated with drug use, including disease prevalence and rates of infection like HIV and HCV.

Experiment vs Non-Experimental Methods

Organigrama arbol

INTEREST GROUPS: SPANISH ABORTION NEW LAW

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

Harm Reduction

Disease prevalence and rates of infection

Is distribution model better than exchange model for iV drug use and users?

Law

How far is this model pushing the law?

How will police officers interact with greater incidence of needles among some criminals they come in contact with?

Ethics

Enabling

Pros

Users get amount of needles they need

Less regulation may or may not be helpful for users

Better for transient populations with unreliable/unstable housing.

Cons

People may not bring needles back.

Distribution makes it appear as though there is increased level of support for very negative behavior.

Model could disrupt intimate relationship that the exchange currently has with clients.

Lack of multiple points of contact with clients

Potentially greater cost

Psychology

Potential for recovery

Addiction

Sociology

Relationships between users and nonusers

Relationships between users

Economics

Epidemiology

HIV/HCV

Mindomo

Mais Informações

Perguntas frequentes

interdisciplinary studies

The debate over whether a distribution model or an exchange model is better for intravenous drug users involves multiple considerations. Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize negative outcomes associated with drug use, including disease prevalence and rates of infection like HIV and HCV.

Experiment vs Non-Experimental Methods

Organigrama arbol

INTEREST GROUPS: SPANISH ABORTION NEW LAW

Communicable Diseases: Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

Harm Reduction

Disease prevalence and rates of infection

Is distribution model better than exchange model for iV drug use and users?

Law

How far is this model pushing the law?

How will police officers interact with greater incidence of needles among some criminals they come in contact with?

Ethics

Enabling

Pros

Users get amount of needles they need

Less regulation may or may not be helpful for users

Better for transient populations with unreliable/unstable housing.

Cons

People may not bring needles back.

Distribution makes it appear as though there is increased level of support for very negative behavior.

Model could disrupt intimate relationship that the exchange currently has with clients.

Lack of multiple points of contact with clients

Potentially greater cost

Psychology

Potential for recovery

Addiction

Sociology

Relationships between users and nonusers

Relationships between users

Economics

Epidemiology

HIV/HCV

Espalhe a idéia Mindomo

Mindomo

Mais Informações

Perguntas frequentes