Prissättning Logga in Registrera

Kategorier: Alla - uv - absorption - authenticity

av Dina Kamaly för 13 årar sedan

336

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

Mer av detta

Cost Accounting

av Ignacio de la Torre

Vitamins

av GUSTAVO ANGEL CASTELAN LEON

Argument

av Viktor Mobayed

Epithelial Tissue

av heyo H

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

Cost Accounting

Vitamins

Argument

Epithelial Tissue

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Method: No Method used, ONLY Analysis.

Dr. Pruschy

Conclusion: 1- Not Hundred Years old 2- Each Layer has identical absorption.

Findings: 1- Substantial Absportion of Polyene 2- Absportion should be 0.15 but is 0.6

Method: 1- Investigated UV Spectrum of Paint Chip 2- UV Spectrum of paint chip

Mindomo

Mer Info

Vanliga frågor

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

Cost Accounting

Vitamins

Argument

Epithelial Tissue

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Method: No Method used, ONLY Analysis.

Dr. Pruschy

Conclusion: 1- Not Hundred Years old 2- Each Layer has identical absorption.

Findings: 1- Substantial Absportion of Polyene 2- Absportion should be 0.15 but is 0.6

Method: 1- Investigated UV Spectrum of Paint Chip 2- UV Spectrum of paint chip

Sprid ordet om Mindomo

Mindomo

Mer Info

Vanliga frågor