Pricing Log in Sign Up

Categories: All - uv - absorption - authenticity

by Dina Kamaly 13 years ago

341

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

art under scrutiny

by Karen Fanous

Body Language

by gabriela cucaita

Waves

by Lynne Hann

Awesome Human systems mindmap!

by ETHAN SNG HONG YEE N/A

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

art under scrutiny

Body Language

Waves

Awesome Human systems mindmap!

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Method: No Method used, ONLY Analysis.

Dr. Pruschy

Conclusion: 1- Not Hundred Years old 2- Each Layer has identical absorption.

Findings: 1- Substantial Absportion of Polyene 2- Absportion should be 0.15 but is 0.6

Method: 1- Investigated UV Spectrum of Paint Chip 2- UV Spectrum of paint chip

Mindomo

More Info

Faq

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Experts conducted a series of analyses to determine the authenticity of a purported Cezanne painting. Dr. Pruschy utilized UV spectroscopy to examine a paint chip and found an unusual absorption level of polyene, suggesting the piece is not a century old due to identical absorption in each layer.

art under scrutiny

Body Language

Waves

Awesome Human systems mindmap!

Cezanne Painting Investigation

Dr. Anderson

Conclusion: Not Authentic

Findings: 1- Yellow areas could be cadmium Based Pigment 2- Such pigment mix wasn't used at Cezanne's time. 3- Presence of underdrawing paints. 4-Animal Glue binder 5-Such binders were used in the late 19th century.

Method: IR Spectroscopy, IR Refractography & Transmission Spectra

Dr. Marden

Conclusion: 1-A previously unknown Cezanne. 2-Probably painted in late 1880's

Findings: 1- unsigned painting usual for Cezanne 2-Similar to another Cezanne painting. 3- Characteristics of Cezanne's work: Bruskwork with solid brushstrokes groupings

Method: No Method used, ONLY Analysis.

Dr. Pruschy

Conclusion: 1- Not Hundred Years old 2- Each Layer has identical absorption.

Findings: 1- Substantial Absportion of Polyene 2- Absportion should be 0.15 but is 0.6

Method: 1- Investigated UV Spectrum of Paint Chip 2- UV Spectrum of paint chip

Spread the word about Mindomo

Mindomo

More Info

Faq