Kategorier: Alla - income - regulation - housing - hotels

av Steven Lee för 4 årar sedan

233

Nov 5 2019 Election

The discussion revolves around the regulation of short-term rentals and its broader economic and social implications. Advocates for limiting such rentals argue that they exacerbate the housing crisis by reducing the availability of long-term rental options and inflating property prices.

Nov 5 2019 Election

Other Topics

Police

TNC's vs Taxi Justice

medallions
what changes happened since TNC's?

price drop

losers

people who paid million for the medallion in order to be able to drive and retire

they have no options now - we should probably do a bigger safety net...?

winners

people who bought medallions at low prices?

used to be retirement options -'darwinian capitalism'
honestly i seem to favor TNC's for their innovative use of tech and being the future of transportation. i would look into detail the issue with medallions and see who could be faulted or pitied and how we could actually phase out taxis or tweak the regulations so that
medallion buybacks
regulation history/research
fees/medallions to limit the number of cars on the road - how can uber go around these regulations? or how can we level the playing field?

why don't we just let the free market regulate it?

Correcting government regulation in the face of free market innovation. both should be protected

Regulating (Limiting) Short Term Rentals

Proposal Text - For now - Ban?
the housing issue paints glaring issues for our capitalistic society and housing as a human right. it appears that structural changes are needed; we have to get over our productive but not caring every man for themselves phase and move toward taking care of everyone. (especially given technological progress).
Limiting the "sharing" economy

we should encourage the sharing of resources

Effects on Hotel rates and stays?

Visitors/hotel stays will decline and prices may increase

Free market

this is a product in demand and the government should not interfere

there are eocnomic effects that are affecting teh entire community and must be addressed, short of other solutions being worked on concurrently

Effect on supply of long term housing

Long term renting has a lot of issues that renters dont want to deal with. Homeowners wont do long term rentals if short term rentals are banned or regulated

The increase in short term rentals have exasperated the housing crisis and should be regulated to provide more housing

Source of income for homeowners;

Dependence on short term rental income to make ends meet; short term rentals are beneficial to both renter and rentee; enables home owners to remain in city.

November 5, 2019 Municipal Election (https://sfelections.sfgov.org/measures)

F) Campaign Contributions and Campaign Advertisements

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_F.pdf
increasing disclosure requirements

fear of repercussions: some groups may be attacked or harassed for their support of certain measures; doxxing, etc.

separate laws should be made, if they aren't already to deter this

the public has a right to know who is advocating for what because it leads to more informed decisions of the electorate.

banning corporate money

corps should have an amplified voice

gvt's and elections should be by the people for the people, businesses should not have a larger or amplified voice and who have a blatant profit motive

E) Affordable Housing and Educator Housing

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_E.pdf
loss of local control of neighborhoods

some neighbors like that publicly zoned land is publicly zoned land. we should not take away neighbor's preferences.

the problem is too great

private efforts are better

public option is not good, not addressing the underlying economic phenomenon - supply and demand - what are steps we can take to induce supply?

can and should explore both efforts at one time

feasibility - will it even put a dent in the problem?

it won't do much, not a structural fix, distracting, should do something that will make a drastic impact. will only effect a small number of educators, small lottery system, how many total units are coming, anyway?

something is better than nothing

use of public land - should plots zoned for gvt buildings be repurposed?

yes, given the need, the crisis, and that teachers are special people in our communities

cost

this will somehow cost us more money, government shouldnt be spending money like this.

the city will save money in the long run by keeping teachers in the city as opposed to other strategies like raising pay so that people can afford market rate housing

Preferences for educators

individual populations shouldn't get special access, all should be treated the same. non educators included is too big of a net to cast

does not address non SFUSD teachers

is it not a step in the right direction? Would you scrap the whole project cuz it's not perfect? that is to lose the forest for the trees

educators play a special role in our communities and should have special attention paid in keeping good teachers in the city. without good teachers, generations of kids will suffer and the potential bright futures will be limited.

D) Traffic Congestion Mitigation Tax

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_D.pdf
Taxing businesses and customers to fund mitigation measures

let the free market do its thing, tncs and transpo companies are reducing congestion and being good for environment by using cars for longer instead of single people driving single cars

makes sense to tax those industries that are contributing to congestion

C) Vapor Products

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_C.pdf
Corporation writing Laws for the public

corporations profit motive clouds their actions, their fiduciary obligations to stakeholders clearly bind their decisions to benefit stakeholders and themselves first, above public health; all else is PR/marketing; juul writing laws when they were the probably source or big part of the epidemic in youth should be outrageous

Juul are experts, they are committed to public health; they know what they are doing when they write these laws; corporations are part of democracy

FDA approval

they are the most experienced agency and presumably have expertise, procedures, workflow; they've battled big tobacco and its a huge part of their institutional history

we cant trust trump admin, we should do things in the city ourselves, we shouldnt tie in local stuff with federal agencies, it slows down business

Protecting Youth vs Availability of cessation devices

big epidemic, anything to stop the supply to kids is good, kids are more important than adults because they are a vulnerable population; adults can just drive outside city boundaries

Banning E cigs (until FDA approve)

not a moratorium, just need proper regulation, specifically of its marketing to youth

prohibition is bad

B) Rename Department of Disability and Aging Services

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_B.pdf
Adding specifications for seats 1-3
Public Cost

Superficial changes, will cost some money to change the names everywhere

For

the cost is worth it for articulating and amending the commission to account for disabled persons in its deliberations and work

A) Affordable Housing Bond

Housing Needs

The market will correct itself, it will just take time.

The city must act on housing, subsidizing projects and encouraging development, the problem continues to grow, causing people to be priced out; housing is a right,

Public Expenditure
Increased Costs to Taxpayers - Interest + 50% of property tax increase to be passed to tenants

Against

Too expensive, regressive tax, Property tax is not the ideal way to fund this. or landowners should pay more than tenants

we all have to pitch in - the landowners and the tenants of san francisco should pay

Against:

Government is inefficient, will just waste the money, i don't know/ can't trust the gvt to spend smartly; we have enough money

how is the government spending its current budget now?

big research project

openbook.sfgov.org

Pro:

Faith in government, belief in government action,

https://sfelections.sfgov.org/sites/default/files/Documents/candidates/Nov2019_LT_A.pdf

Offices

Races
Single Candidate / Unopposed

Community College Board

Sheriff

City Attorney

Public Defender

Treasurer

Board of Education - "set policy" for the schools

Kirsten Strobel

Robert Coleman

Hello, Please let me know the candidate's position and policy plans toward existing or the implementation of civics curriculum in San Francisco, with as much detail as possible.

Hi Steven, My whole career as a public interest attorney, Stanford MBA management professional, writer, editor, teacher, and community servant has been consistently focused on healthy civics in action and instruction. It is hugely important! In our schools, it tends too often to get inartfully folded into other frameworks. One way to start earlier and better is through creative participatory teaching, especially through the making songs and artworks in the context of civic engagement -- yet the SFUSD currently denigrates and limits those very simple things we both expect in this regard, out of mere confusion I think. I look forward to helping improve this and turn it around. It's a central motivation for me, far beyond the mere statements of intent I've observed in others. Thank you very much for asking. Please feel free to ask more great questions, and/or follow up with your ideas on this one. I appreciate it greatly. Yours, Robert Coleman, candidate for San Francisco Board of Education

Jenny Lam

District Attorney (the legal agency charged with prosecuting crimes) - they 'put the victim first' ' are the measure of how 'tough' we want to be on crime. most powerful position in the criminal justice apparatus. the power to charge crimes in a huge bastion of effort on the greater reform of criminal justice

Nancy Tung

career prosecutor

Leif Dutch

Suzy Loftus - "a commitment to a reduction of mass incarceration, ending cash bail, and looking at financial justice within the system.”

Loftus’s tendency to “duck” on controversial issues around police accountability, as when she refused to endorse a 2016 bill in the state legislature that sought to make records of police misconduct in the state more transparent.

legal counsel for sf sheriff

the sheriff has a whole host of issues. why is she defending them

bad flavor for me. london's move is undemocratic and makes me want to punish london for that

Chesa Boudin, a public defender, described as the most progressive. son of radical activists (i cant say with absolute certainty that chesa is the right choice. he's never prosecuted a single case, in fact hes always fought against prosecutors whose jobs are to send people away. but)

police union calls him dangerous and say he will work to put criminals back in the streets

against money bail

moneybail stuff is the wrong move

bad stuff on money bal

lack of experience

against

he will mess it up, dangerous precedent, criminals will be out on the streets

for

represent a big softening on crime and incarcaration

career prosecutors can be criticized as tunneling into the mindset of locking up criminals, when there may be a bigger picture. when noting prosecutorial missteps and problems in the overall justice system, it might help for different or more holistic perspectives to get in the mix

Supervisor, D5

Nomvula Omara

Ryan Lam

Dean Preston, democratic socialist

Vallie Brown, establishment

Subtopic

Mayor

Paul Robertson

Wilma Pang

Robert Jordan

Joel Ventresca

Ellen Lee Zhou

right wing, NRA member, was in news

London Breed

How to Choose
Endorsements
Stance on Issues
Transparency/Quality of Platform and presentation

good website

detailed plans

Government / Elected Experience
Political Party/ Affiliation