Categorías: Todo - parenting

por Jessika Vroman hace 4 años

280

EDPsych: Mod 2

A comprehensive look at Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory reveals the various layers of environmental influence on human development. These include the microsystem, which encompasses immediate environments such as family and school, and the macrosystem, which involves broader cultural patterns like beliefs and morals.

EDPsych: Mod 2

VS

Chapter 2: EdPysch

Baumrind

Parenting styles
Uninvolved

no rules & no emotional connection

Permissive

less control no set rules w/ close emotional connection

Authoritarian

high level of control w/ no emotional connections

Authoritative

limits & rules & enforce & high emotional connectedness

Responsiveness
Control

Parental employment

Subtopic
Children of working mom's had more household responsibilities than did children of non-working mothers, that leads to positive rather than negative outcomes such as advanced social development
Children w/ working mom's were not more likely to be involved in delinquent acts than were children of non-working moms
girls w/ working mom's tend to have higher IQ scores compared to non working moms
Girls w/ working mom's have higher achievement goals or greater desire to excel academically, higher school achievement compared to girls w/o working moms

Peer Context

Crowds
Larger groups based on reputations of peer groups w/ common labels

6. Loners

5. Druggies/parties/burnouts

4. Normal's (others)

3. Brains/nerds

2. Jocks

1. Populars/Preps(elites)

Cliques
Small groups of 2-8 people who know each other well

similar # of demographics

values

activies

ses

race

age

Bronfenbrenner's

Chronosystem
chronological nature of development with individual & history of area
Macrosystem
Broad cultural patterns such as beliefs, customs, knowledge, morals
Exosystem
2 or more environments 1 does not directly include individual such as parents work and parents home
Mesosystem
2 more microsystem
Microsystem
Immediate environment of person such as family, peers, school

Peer Statuses

Neglected
are not nominated as liked or disliked and do not show high rates of overt or relational aggression
Rejected youth
tend to be less well-liked by peers including those within their own cliques and are members of smaller peer cliques
Popular
perceived popularity

students nominate peers who are most popular or "cool" & those who are the least popular or "cool"

sociometric popularity

students nominate peers that they like most

Relational Aggression
behaviors specifically intended to damage another child's friendships, social status, or feelings of inclusion in a peer group

cyberbullying

intentional acts of relational aggression using electronic forms such as texting and social media

Overt Aggression
fighting with intent to harm another phsyically