Anthropologists must be vigilant about maintaining objectivity in their research to avoid bias, which can lead to controversy and hinder clear communication of results. Bias in research results can restrict the scope of the study and alienate readers who may not share the same views.
How the case study relates to
anthropology and the subfields
Biological/Physical
Anthropology
The case study relates to Biological/Physical Anthropology
because the podcast compares the different body types amongst humans and how a certain body type can dominate running better than others. The podcast also explains the genetical reasons behind how Kalenjin's can dominate long-distance running.
Cultural Social
Anthropology
The case study relates to Cultural Social Anthropology
because the podcast compares the differences within Kalenjin and American cultures. They discuss what is socially acceptable between two cultures and their standards they believe in.
The case study relates to Anthropology because
the podcast compares how some humans can dominate
long-distance running better than other humans.
Ethical dilemma
What is it about anthropological
study that can lead researchers
into these ethical areas?
Anthropologist can be lead to these ethical areas by
asking questions which may be answered by an interview. Like George Warner, he travelled to Iten, Kenya to
ask someone who is qualified, for instance, a Kalenjin, to answer his question.
Why are these dilemmas?
This is an ethical dilemma because both available options are negative in Elly's situation. He was not comfortable with either option. His culture disapproved his other option. His other option would limit him to pursue his wishes if he does not comply with the Kalenjin tradition.
What are some ethical dilemmas
that might be involved in this case
study?
When George Warner interviewed Elly Kipgogel, Elly had to
chose between going against his tradition that he does not agree with or, obeying his tradition by forcing himself because 'he felt he had to do it.'
What is an ethical dilemma?
The decision has to be made between two or more options, neither of which results in a solution
that meets accepted ethical standards.
Subfields
Biological/physical
anthropology
The study of human evolution
and human biology.
Cultural social
anthropology
The study of culture and societies
around the world.
Questions for each
field/subfield related
to the case study
Physical
Anthropology
-How might running everyday affect an individual
physically?
-What are the benefits?
Biological
Anthropology
How does genetics give an individual a better
advantage than others with different genetics?
Cultural Social
Anthropology
-Should we follow our cultures standards and traditions?
-Would it affect their society? Themselves?
Anthropology
What is the significance to comparing
different human beings?
Ethnocentric: A comparison of two
different cultures while judging
and evaluating each standards
What impact might have this have on
communicating results to others?
Bias can effect communicating research results by
not comprehending information that does not comply with their opinion. It does not allow the researcher to expand the research because they are basing it around their bias opinion that readers may not agree with.
What do anthropologist need to be
aware of while studying their field?
Anthropologist need to be aware of bias opinion in a
published research. If a anthropologist publishes an article, which include their bias opinion, it may spark controversy.
How might this term relates
to the case study?
This term relates to the case study because the podcast
compares the differences between Americans and Kalenjin's about their beliefs of circumcision. While they are comparing, they are implying their opinions about both beliefs.