Kategoriak: All - efficiency - rights - impact - judiciary

arabera Abouelfetouh ElSammak 9 years ago

339

Proportionality Test

The principle of proportionality is a judicial standard used to assess whether actions taken by authorities are appropriate and necessary relative to their objectives. Rooted in various legal traditions, it has become a fundamental aspect of administrative law in many jurisdictions.

Proportionality Test

Principle of Proportionality

STEP: Outline

Conclusion
The efficiency of principle of proportionality
Summary paragraph
Body Paragraphs
Consequences and impact on society
Practice of proportionality test

Case studies of Egyptian State Council and the American administrative courts

Consequences and impact

Political

Ecomical

Limitation

Separation of powers

Acts of Sovereignty

Scope of application

The 3 pong test

Definition

French State Council

Governmental project vs Public interest

Police measures vs Fundamental rights

United Kingdom - Lord Greene rule 1947

First paragraph: Introduction
How efficient is the Proportionality Test applied by the administrative courts?
Informative sentences

"C'est le contrôle d'adéquation de l'objet de l'acte à ses motifs"

"setting a very high standard of judicial review for invalidation"

Would the judiciary positively affect social and public development?

STEP: Research Sources

SECONDARY SOURCES
Peter Johnston, Proportionality in Administrative Law: Wunderkind or Problem Child - University of Western Australia Law Review
Nathalie Belley, L’emergence d’un principe de proportionnalite - Cahiers de Droit
Aurelien Portuese, Principle of Proportionality as Principle of Economic Efficiency
The proportionality test in UK Administrative Law - a new ground of review, or a fading exception? - The Student Journal of Law
George A. Bermann, The Principle of Proportionality
PRIMARY SOURCES
Arrêt "Ville nouvelle Est" 1971 - French State Council
Arrêt Benjamin 1933 - French State Council
Lord Greene MR rule in Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Coroporation case 1947