Hinnoittelu Kirjautua sisään Rekisteröidy

Luokat: Kaikki - variables - confidence - accuracy

jonka Geraldine Pearce 13 vuotta sitten

1505

Penrod and Cutler

Research focused on jurors' reliance on witness confidence in a trial setting. Participants, including both undergraduates and experienced jurors, watched a videotape of a robbery trial where various conditions were manipulated, such as weapon visibility, suspect disguise, retention interval, and witness confidence.

Penrod and Cutler

Lisää tämän kaltaisia

Jett Sc.Fair

Jett Sc.Fair

luonut Steve Bloom

Differences between field studies, surveys, field experiments, and laboratory experiments

Differences between field studies, surveys, field experiments, and laboratory experiments

luonut Mary Lou Doucette

physical literacy

physical literacy

luonut makayla balfour

rugby

rugby

luonut MOHD ALHAFIZ

Penrod and Cutler

Results

67% convicted when witness was 100% sure

60% convicted when witness was 80% sure

Only significant effect was witness confidence

Participants

Eligible and experienced jurors

Undergraduates

Conclusion

Jurors' trust in confidence is indiminished

Confidence is a poor predictor of witness accuracy

Procedure

Participants had to decide if robber was found guilty or not

Participants experienced either high or low variable conditions on a random basis

10 variables altogether

4 of the variables

Witness confidence

80% confident

100% confident

Retention interval

2 days

14 days

Weapon focus

LOW: Weapon visible

HIGH: Weapon clearly brandished

Suspect in discuise

LOW: Minimal disguise

HIGH: Heavily disguised

Witness testified either 80% or 100% sure she identified the robber

videotape of robbery trial

Methodology

Independent measures design

Mock-trial scenario

Experiment