Kategorier: Alle - evidence - empiricism - science - skepticism

av Vargha Dana 15 år siden

282

Scientific and Critical thinking-vargha

Critical thinking and scientific thinking, while similar, diverge in focus with the former addressing societal issues and the latter investigating natural phenomena. Empirical evidence, which is derived from sensory experience, is considered more reliable than other forms such as emotional or hearsay evidence.

Scientific and Critical thinking-vargha

Scientific and Critical Thinking

they are the same but critical thinking deals with life and society while scientific thinking deals with investigating nature.

scientific method in practice

6.constructing theory
5.test fails
back to step '3'
4.testing hypothesis
3.proposing hypothesis
2.gathering information
1.stating the problem

Skeptisism

constant questioning of one's beliefs & conclusions

accept things as true only baced on
Logical Arguement
Emperical Evidence
test your beliefs against objectives
knowledge claims by self or others must be questioned
self-deception/deception by others: common human failings

Rationalism

logical reasoning

struggle with one's will,subjective beliefs, emotions and feelings

must be learned through formal education
cannot develope & improve it on their own
not born with it
not used by most people

Empiricism

can be seen, heard, touched, tasted, smelled

Natrural evidence: Evidence found in nature
Naturalism

rejects

beliefs based on Dogma

supernaturalism

absolute truth

emphsises strong connection between science & nature

relies on natural evidence

more reliable than:
authoritarian evidence
emotional evidence
spectral evidence
revelatory evidence
circumstancial evidence
testimonial evidence
hearsay evidence